The Japan Times - Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names

EUR -
AED 4.120156
AFN 72.364884
ALL 90.803943
AMD 404.528384
ANG 2.007949
AOA 1029.898611
ARS 1734.077131
AUD 1.621035
AWG 2.022213
AZN 1.906081
BAM 1.955937
BBD 2.253758
BDT 138.979752
BGN 1.960881
BHD 0.42253
BIF 3354.750342
BMD 1.121894
BND 1.432207
BOB 13.298696
BRL 6.180617
BSD 1.118979
BTN 105.025369
BWP 15.374599
BYN 3.350535
BYR 21989.116896
BZD 2.250558
CAD 1.584148
CDF 2570.258612
CHF 0.919678
CLF 0.027618
CLP 1086.958598
CNY 7.486172
CNH 7.481113
COP 3675.536984
CRC 506.835563
CUC 1.121894
CUP 26.855884
CVE 110.270772
CZK 24.341896
DJF 199.263982
DKK 7.475391
DOP 68.084777
DZD 152.624682
EGP 60.451115
ERN 16.828406
ETB 180.792892
FJD 2.526282
FKP 0.835984
GBP 0.834594
GEL 2.90596
GGP 0.835984
GHS 13.075684
GIP 0.835984
GMD 83.020251
GNF 9913.739794
GTQ 8.5506
GYD 234.582278
HKD 8.799058
HNL 30.074574
HRK 7.59411
HTG 146.670291
HUF 362.320075
IDR 20262.354178
ILS 3.543827
IMP 0.835984
INR 104.947573
IQD 1699.668985
IRR 2134162.158274
ISK 137.16221
JEP 0.835984
JMD 177.762473
JOD 0.795385
JPY 177.333286
KES 145.756022
KGS 98.109695
KHR 4566.320402
KMF 492.511066
KPW 1009.704304
KRW 1510.529067
KWD 0.348718
KYD 0.932565
KZT 502.045227
LAK 25242.608639
LBP 100206.73114
LKR 372.066107
LRD 190.233348
LSL 18.477482
LTL 3.31266
LVL 0.678622
LYD 7.190505
MAD 10.932472
MDL 20.170415
MGA 5155.101381
MKD 61.541364
MMK 2355.63634
MNT 4040.44421
MOP 9.037734
MRU 45.421187
MUR 52.76234
MVR 17.288641
MWK 1940.336146
MXN 20.784538
MYR 4.548717
MZN 71.700386
NAD 18.477574
NGN 1510.069344
NIO 41.083519
NOK 10.545145
NPR 168.037795
NZD 1.990812
OMR 0.43133
PAB 1.119079
PEN 3.85047
PGK 5.036742
PHP 70.770227
PKR 310.314733
PLN 4.385572
PYG 6994.490778
QAR 4.090487
RON 5.342349
RSD 117.608052
RUB 92.555869
RWF 1655.516162
SAR 4.218787
SBD 9.084309
SCR 16.429785
SDG 674.81632
SEK 10.994205
SGD 1.434341
SHP 0.834773
SLE 25.747516
SLL 23525.555278
SOS 639.544875
SRD 42.129343
STD 23220.934893
STN 24.501719
SVC 9.791687
SYP 14586.861783
SZL 18.395799
THB 37.502602
TJS 10.272421
TMT 3.937847
TND 3.374093
TOP 2.701251
TRY 56.347225
TTD 7.589533
TWD 36.871595
TZS 2967.406681
UAH 50.976387
UGX 4582.239831
USD 1.121894
UYU 45.123166
UZS 13422.941839
VES 1006.540888
VND 28695.797549
VUV 134.628489
WST 3.11898
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021165
XAU 0.000272750831
XCD 3.031974
XCG 2.016742
XDR 0.793237
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 265.336214
ZAR 18.376058
ZMK 10098.392022
ZMW 22.743596
ZWL 361.24932
SSP 6446.193262
MXV 2.33655
  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    19.81

    +0.5%

  • VOD

    -0.2500

    16.33

    -1.53%

  • CMSC

    -0.2800

    20.12

    -1.39%

  • RBGPF

    -2.0000

    65

    -3.08%

  • RIO

    -0.2500

    94.16

    -0.27%

  • BTI

    -1.2000

    54.85

    -2.19%

  • NGG

    -0.3000

    74.94

    -0.4%

  • GSK

    -0.3500

    49.35

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    -0.4200

    20.14

    -2.09%

  • CMSD

    -0.3400

    19.93

    -1.71%

  • BP

    -0.9100

    43.52

    -2.09%

  • RELX

    0.1700

    33.24

    +0.51%

  • BCC

    -0.6200

    75.97

    -0.82%

  • AZN

    -1.9400

    164.21

    -1.18%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names
Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names / Photo: JOSH EDELSON - AFP

Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names

Glacier National Park's ice fortress is crumbling. The giant trees of Sequoia National Park are ablaze. And even the tenacious cacti of Saguaro National Park are struggling to endure a decades-long drought.

Text size:

Since their creation, national parks have embodied the pioneering spirit of America in their vast expanses and breathtaking landscapes.

But today, the climate crisis imperils the very symbols of many parks, leaving them facing a future where their names could be cruel ironies.

Deep within Montana's Glacier National Park, the once majestic Grinnell Glacier is now greatly diminished.

After a grueling trek, visitors are met with a stunning sight: a serene lake of pale blue water, nestled among towering peaks.

But as beautiful as it is, the very presence of this lake is testament to the ravages of a fast-warming planet.

Just a few decades ago, this landscape was entirely frozen.

Now the glacier itself is relegated to a small hollow, sheltered from the Sun, at the edge of the lake created through its own melting.

As he straps on his crampons, student Ryan Bergman marvels at what still remains of the ice body.

"I want to know that this stuff is here for years to come," says the 22-year-old, who has embarked on a two-month journey to explore a dozen parks.

He dreams of one day returning with his own children to see the same sights.

But time is running out.

The park has already lost 60 percent of its namesake glaciers since the 1850s, and scientists predict their complete disappearance by century's end.

- Philosophical shift -

Families from all over America and abroad flock to these natural wonders to create memories that will last.

Conserving the nation's 63 national parks is a rare point of political convergence in a sharply divided country. With tens of millions of visitors to these sites every year, it's also an economic imperative.

President Joe Biden's government recently announced nearly $200 million to help them adapt -- funding made available through his signature climate law.

Yet despite these efforts, the reality is that not everything can be saved.

This sobering truth has sparked an identity crisis for the federal agency charged with their protection, the National Park Service (NPS).

It was brought into existence by a 1916 law that called to preserve these treasured sites "unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."

But it's now "pretty clear that it's not achievable in many places," admits John Gross, an ecologist with the NPS climate change response program.

"It's certainly possible that the parks could lose the iconic feature for which they've been named."

The climate crisis has thus brought about a profound shift in the organization's philosophy: It's no longer taboo to modify a park's natural state to stem further degradation.

- Chopper rides for bull trout -

Where battles have already been lost, strategic interventions are now underway to try to win the war.

On the shores of Glacier's Lake McDonald, Chris Downs, the park's head of aquatic resources, shares the story of the massive effort it took to rescue the beleaguered bull trout.

The fish is a native species threatened by warming waters, which are driven in part by reduced ice melt in later summer.

It is also facing competition from non-native lake trout, which were introduced for fishing and are better suited to the changing conditions.

Fifty years ago, bull trout outnumbered their invasive counterparts by a five-to-one margin. Today, the situation is reversed.

In 2014, a decision was made to relocate the native species to cooler, upstream waters where they had never previously been found.

Downs recalls workers transporting dozens of fish in backpacks filled with ice packs, with thousands more from fish farms slated to be whisked away to their new habitats via helicopter.

"They're growing really well" in their new home, says the biologist.

Critics call it a manipulation of nature. Downs calls it a "necessity."

Also as a result of climate change, the park ia conducting DNA testing of threatened whitebark pines, identifying those most resilient to drought for planting at targeted locations as part of a restoration plan.

- Rebuilding beaches -

A 2018 study revealed national parks are warming at twice the rate of the rest of the country, because they are mainly located in climate-sensitive regions like mountain ranges or in Alaska, near the North Pole.

"We're already seeing transformational impacts of anthropogenic climate change throughout parks right now," warns Gross.

At Indiana Dunes National Park, beaches are submerged, and the eponymous dunes are collapsing.

This time, park workers are fighting back.

Every year, they fill in a damaged site along the southern shore of Lake Michigan, where the park's unique biodiversity thrives amid surrounding steel mills and a coal-fired power station.

On a day in November, the battle against erosion is symbolized by the comings and goings of two large excavator trucks.

Some 80,000 tons of sand, excavated from a quarry, are used to replenish the beach at the foot of the most famous dune in the park: Mount Baldy, a popular summer spot for vacationing tourists from Chicago.

As Thomas Kanies, project manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, explains: "The goal is always to keep the beach at what it always has been" -- and doing so will also preserve the dunes behind the beach.

The proximity to Michigan City's industrial port is the main culprit for erosion, Kanies said, because the pier blocks the flow of sand along the coast.

While the situation was once manageable, climate change "is changing the game completely," says NPS geologist Erin Argyilan.

- Harsh tradeoffs -

The ice shelf that forms in winter "has been kind of our first line of defense to protect the dunes from the high waves that naturally come with fall and winter storms," Argyilan explains.

But with climate change, the ice isn't coming until at least December if not January, while the storms begin in late October.

Compounding the issue are warmer lakes, which fuel more intense storms, and increasingly severe rainwater runoff.

Another phenomenon that Argyilan is studying: a faster freeze-thaw cycle on the sands, which is causing dune segments to collapse.

"Our goal is to minimize the impact as much as possible," says Argyilan, while acknowledging that beach nourishment amounts to a "Band-Aid."

More drastic measures have also been attempted.

Lake Michigan, which has a natural 30-year cycle of fluctuations, hit a recent water level peak in 2020, amplifying the effects of violent storms.

Houses in one of the villages adjacent to the park threatened to collapse, and residents erected massive rock blocks on the beach to shield them from erosion.

This solution however sparked controversy as the obstacles worsened the degradation of dunes further along the shore.

As Betsy Maher, executive director of the group Save the Dunes, puts it: "We can't destroy the beach for the sake of a few homes."

The dilemma encapsulates the harsh tradeoff that is at times imposed by climate change: preserve the natural world, or prioritize humans?

- A Sisyphean task -

At Saguaro National Park in Arizona, home to the largest concentration of iconic saguaro cacti in the country, approximately two million of the towering desert plants cluster together like a forest, their arms outstretched towards the sky.

To the untrained eye, they appear to be thriving.

However, these resilient cacti that evolved to cope with ultra-arid environments are facing hidden threats as a result of a drought that began around 30 years ago.

In 2020 and again last year, the region experienced unusually meager rainfall in the summer, typically a time of monsoon rains.

During this period, a non-native plant, buffelgrass, began to colonize the park. This invasive weed, introduced from Africa as livestock fodder, fuels fires that have ravaged saguaros in the past, as in 1994 and 1999.

The species, which covers the mountainsides in straw-yellow clumps, "is very dry for much of the year, and it can ignite quickly and quite easily," says park biologist Frankie Foley.

Volunteers gather every weekend under Foley's direction to take on the invaders, pulling them from the ground by hand. Armed with pickaxes, they dig tirelessly, facing a daunting task given the park's vastness.

- Next generation imperiled -

The drought has become so intense that saguaros are also struggling to ensure the future of the species.

Young saguaros, which grow slowly, are particularly vulnerable due to their limited water storage capacity. By age 15, they are a mere six inches (10 centimeters) in height, making them highly susceptible to drought conditions.

As a result, "since the mid-1990s, we haven't had very many young saguaros surviving at all," says Don Swann, another biologist at the park.

Equipped with a yardstick to measure baby saguaros, Swann finds only a single specimen after a 10-minute search.

At first glance, it's hard to see anything amiss due to the longevity of the old cacti, which can live for up to two centuries.

According to the park's decennial census, the saguaro population in 2020 was only slightly higher than in 2010, and Swann expects a decline in 2030.

If current trends continue, "then at a certain point... we won't have saguaros in Saguaro National Park," he says.

- A wake-up call? -

Beyond the ecological devastation, the loss of saguaros and glaciers has far-reaching cultural consequences.

For Native American tribes, these natural wonders hold deep spiritual significance.

The Tohono O'odham people consider saguaros their ancestors, and rely on their fruit to make ceremonial syrup.

Similarly, the Blackfeet Nation reveres glaciers as sacred, recognizing their crucial role in sustaining life.

"We were placed here in this area, because of that water," says Termaine Edmo, the tribe's climate change coordinator.

Under her dedicated leadership, the Blackfeet have built snow fences to preserve snow on the Montana grasslands just below the mountains, a moisture-saving technique.

Her personal connection to the land is palpable: the Native American name of one of her daughters, Iitspigoonskoo, means "glacier."

"She's constantly asking me, 'Mommy, what happens when there's no more snow on top of the mountains? Does my Indian name change?'" Edmo says. To which she replied: "'No, then we adapt, baby, just like our ancestors adapted to this new world.'"

Could these losses serve as a wake-up call and prompt more Americans to recognize climate change as a priority?

Wylie Carr, a climate planning specialist for the NPS, agrees that national parks are "natural classrooms" for young and old alike to "really see and experience how climate change is impacting natural and cultural resources."

To this end, Glacier National Park's winding trails are dotted with signs that pose poignant questions.

"How many glaciers will be left for the next generation?" pleads one.

The hope is that raising awareness will inspire conviction -- and action.

S.Suzuki--JT