The Japan Times - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.254039
AFN 72.440766
ALL 95.933853
AMD 435.626678
ANG 2.073543
AOA 1062.206441
ARS 1618.265961
AUD 1.662266
AWG 2.08503
AZN 1.965325
BAM 1.955462
BBD 2.327208
BDT 141.775525
BGN 1.979978
BHD 0.437383
BIF 3427.123166
BMD 1.15835
BND 1.478351
BOB 7.984656
BRL 6.060605
BSD 1.155506
BTN 107.993823
BWP 15.789342
BYN 3.440621
BYR 22703.660648
BZD 2.323909
CAD 1.593096
CDF 2632.929536
CHF 0.913411
CLF 0.026701
CLP 1054.295166
CNY 7.970024
CNH 7.986511
COP 4300.31658
CRC 538.909294
CUC 1.15835
CUP 30.696276
CVE 110.246444
CZK 24.459836
DJF 205.765367
DKK 7.472007
DOP 68.568459
DZD 153.694034
EGP 60.628276
ERN 17.37525
ETB 180.413234
FJD 2.574722
FKP 0.865345
GBP 0.864401
GEL 3.144921
GGP 0.865345
GHS 12.640872
GIP 0.865345
GMD 84.559929
GNF 10128.295263
GTQ 8.85051
GYD 241.739312
HKD 9.075366
HNL 30.583852
HRK 7.532518
HTG 151.344527
HUF 389.20566
IDR 19613.18276
ILS 3.609013
IMP 0.865345
INR 108.466627
IQD 1513.738682
IRR 1523288.210956
ISK 143.588617
JEP 0.865345
JMD 181.999367
JOD 0.821239
JPY 183.823171
KES 149.751724
KGS 101.29835
KHR 4630.220667
KMF 492.298982
KPW 1042.481609
KRW 1739.245175
KWD 0.355104
KYD 0.96293
KZT 556.925778
LAK 24836.819607
LBP 103478.183136
LKR 362.848927
LRD 211.454409
LSL 19.592902
LTL 3.420306
LVL 0.700674
LYD 7.396755
MAD 10.800282
MDL 20.209598
MGA 4809.190544
MKD 61.632498
MMK 2432.10526
MNT 4134.118112
MOP 9.322791
MRU 46.126236
MUR 53.944518
MVR 17.896561
MWK 2003.262822
MXN 20.683452
MYR 4.569113
MZN 74.03046
NAD 19.591127
NGN 1586.418349
NIO 42.522843
NOK 11.314172
NPR 172.789917
NZD 1.985052
OMR 0.445383
PAB 1.155506
PEN 4.019706
PGK 4.98916
PHP 69.466489
PKR 322.55241
PLN 4.264471
PYG 7550.729104
QAR 4.225389
RON 5.095005
RSD 117.498369
RUB 94.898293
RWF 1689.315664
SAR 4.348618
SBD 9.326707
SCR 17.725312
SDG 696.168046
SEK 10.861431
SGD 1.480881
SHP 0.869063
SLE 28.437469
SLL 24290.033558
SOS 660.388847
SRD 43.248734
STD 23975.506985
STN 24.495877
SVC 10.110211
SYP 128.550844
SZL 19.585703
THB 37.829972
TJS 11.040642
TMT 4.054225
TND 3.405227
TOP 2.789028
TRY 51.368209
TTD 7.843969
TWD 37.132646
TZS 3005.918362
UAH 50.734961
UGX 4362.265768
USD 1.15835
UYU 47.082075
UZS 14087.568051
VES 528.791835
VND 30514.994096
VUV 138.374442
WST 3.184159
XAF 655.846612
XAG 0.01723
XAU 0.000266
XCD 3.130499
XCG 2.082432
XDR 0.815663
XOF 655.846612
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.440193
ZAR 19.635944
ZMK 10426.539011
ZMW 22.387232
ZWL 372.988238
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • RYCEF

    0.6300

    15.97

    +3.94%

  • BTI

    0.5500

    57.92

    +0.95%

  • GSK

    0.1500

    51.99

    +0.29%

  • RELX

    0.4500

    33.81

    +1.33%

  • RIO

    2.6900

    85.84

    +3.13%

  • AZN

    0.4700

    184.07

    +0.26%

  • NGG

    0.0700

    82.06

    +0.09%

  • CMSC

    0.2300

    22.88

    +1.01%

  • BCE

    -0.0300

    25.76

    -0.12%

  • BP

    -1.2100

    43.57

    -2.78%

  • BCC

    3.5800

    71.88

    +4.98%

  • VOD

    0.1500

    14.48

    +1.04%

  • JRI

    -0.0900

    11.68

    -0.77%

  • CMSD

    0.0816

    22.74

    +0.36%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

K.Okada--JT