The Japan Times - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.313468
AFN 77.598705
ALL 96.698386
AMD 447.792527
ANG 2.102883
AOA 1077.044807
ARS 1692.205144
AUD 1.764354
AWG 2.114155
AZN 2.001365
BAM 1.955767
BBD 2.361861
BDT 143.307608
BGN 1.957508
BHD 0.442093
BIF 3466.042156
BMD 1.17453
BND 1.514475
BOB 8.102865
BRL 6.365607
BSD 1.17268
BTN 106.04923
BWP 15.537741
BYN 3.457042
BYR 23020.795811
BZD 2.358461
CAD 1.618445
CDF 2630.948518
CHF 0.934916
CLF 0.027253
CLP 1069.11676
CNY 8.28573
CNH 8.284609
COP 4466.125466
CRC 586.590211
CUC 1.17453
CUP 31.125056
CVE 110.26316
CZK 24.276491
DJF 208.826515
DKK 7.472132
DOP 74.548756
DZD 152.289758
EGP 55.571073
ERN 17.617956
ETB 183.229742
FJD 2.668303
FKP 0.879936
GBP 0.878351
GEL 3.175767
GGP 0.879936
GHS 13.461775
GIP 0.879936
GMD 85.741137
GNF 10198.829794
GTQ 8.98185
GYD 245.335906
HKD 9.138141
HNL 30.873485
HRK 7.537789
HTG 153.707435
HUF 385.234681
IDR 19536.845016
ILS 3.785271
IMP 0.879936
INR 106.37734
IQD 1536.174363
IRR 49474.161194
ISK 148.465122
JEP 0.879936
JMD 187.756867
JOD 0.832789
JPY 182.950774
KES 151.217476
KGS 102.713135
KHR 4694.921647
KMF 492.719958
KPW 1057.060817
KRW 1731.880759
KWD 0.360233
KYD 0.977284
KZT 611.589793
LAK 25422.575728
LBP 105012.44747
LKR 362.353953
LRD 206.976546
LSL 19.78457
LTL 3.468083
LVL 0.710462
LYD 6.369894
MAD 10.78842
MDL 19.823669
MGA 5194.913303
MKD 61.548973
MMK 2466.385496
MNT 4167.553805
MOP 9.403343
MRU 46.930217
MUR 53.93488
MVR 18.092159
MWK 2033.466064
MXN 21.157878
MYR 4.812408
MZN 75.064681
NAD 19.78457
NGN 1706.088063
NIO 43.15928
NOK 11.906572
NPR 169.679168
NZD 2.023657
OMR 0.451612
PAB 1.17268
PEN 3.948134
PGK 5.054916
PHP 69.43241
PKR 328.640215
PLN 4.225315
PYG 7876.868545
QAR 4.273829
RON 5.092651
RSD 117.378041
RUB 93.579038
RWF 1706.771516
SAR 4.407079
SBD 9.603843
SCR 17.649713
SDG 706.484352
SEK 10.887784
SGD 1.517615
SHP 0.881202
SLE 28.335591
SLL 24629.319496
SOS 668.988835
SRD 45.275842
STD 24310.407882
STN 24.499591
SVC 10.260829
SYP 12986.886804
SZL 19.77767
THB 37.109332
TJS 10.77682
TMT 4.122602
TND 3.428143
TOP 2.827988
TRY 50.011936
TTD 7.957867
TWD 36.804032
TZS 2902.351563
UAH 49.548473
UGX 4167.930442
USD 1.17453
UYU 46.019232
UZS 14127.764225
VES 314.116117
VND 30897.196663
VUV 142.580188
WST 3.259869
XAF 655.946053
XAG 0.018958
XAU 0.000273
XCD 3.174228
XCG 2.113465
XDR 0.815786
XOF 655.946053
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.129715
ZAR 19.820741
ZMK 10572.187233
ZMW 27.059548
ZWL 378.198309
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    81.17

    0%

  • CMSD

    -0.1500

    23.25

    -0.65%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2500

    14.6

    -1.71%

  • RIO

    -1.0800

    75.66

    -1.43%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    12.59

    +0.4%

  • NGG

    0.2400

    74.93

    +0.32%

  • RELX

    0.1000

    40.38

    +0.25%

  • GSK

    -0.0700

    48.81

    -0.14%

  • BTI

    -1.2700

    57.1

    -2.22%

  • CMSC

    -0.1300

    23.3

    -0.56%

  • BCE

    0.3100

    23.71

    +1.31%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.7

    -0.15%

  • BCC

    0.2500

    76.51

    +0.33%

  • AZN

    -0.4600

    89.83

    -0.51%

  • BP

    -0.2700

    35.26

    -0.77%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

K.Okada--JT