The Japan Times - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

EUR -
AED 4.250766
AFN 72.908308
ALL 96.082221
AMD 436.873271
ANG 2.071606
AOA 1061.215153
ARS 1597.838385
AUD 1.645756
AWG 2.085976
AZN 1.97195
BAM 1.955467
BBD 2.330193
BDT 141.96215
BGN 1.978129
BHD 0.433607
BIF 3437.085868
BMD 1.157268
BND 1.479667
BOB 7.994742
BRL 6.149843
BSD 1.156998
BTN 108.163052
BWP 15.776518
BYN 3.510218
BYR 22682.452195
BZD 2.326894
CAD 1.587483
CDF 2632.785049
CHF 0.912279
CLF 0.0272
CLP 1074.002997
CNY 7.969415
CNH 7.992203
COP 4296.46149
CRC 540.405658
CUC 1.157268
CUP 30.667601
CVE 110.924591
CZK 24.475107
DJF 205.670119
DKK 7.473526
DOP 68.279225
DZD 152.783891
EGP 59.986564
ERN 17.35902
ETB 181.865115
FJD 2.562713
FKP 0.866861
GBP 0.867431
GEL 3.142029
GGP 0.866861
GHS 12.620054
GIP 0.866861
GMD 85.063652
GNF 10157.924053
GTQ 8.862453
GYD 242.061925
HKD 9.063434
HNL 30.737487
HRK 7.53787
HTG 151.782191
HUF 393.182241
IDR 19627.264756
ILS 3.598091
IMP 0.866861
INR 108.614171
IQD 1516.02104
IRR 1522530.672291
ISK 143.814137
JEP 0.866861
JMD 181.768268
JOD 0.820549
JPY 184.278148
KES 149.986328
KGS 101.200658
KHR 4640.644962
KMF 494.153828
KPW 1041.484287
KRW 1742.741851
KWD 0.354823
KYD 0.964148
KZT 556.232895
LAK 24863.90272
LBP 103633.347039
LKR 360.916993
LRD 212.214059
LSL 19.685569
LTL 3.417112
LVL 0.70002
LYD 7.38381
MAD 10.832611
MDL 20.148831
MGA 4825.807832
MKD 61.713417
MMK 2430.000094
MNT 4131.070323
MOP 9.33887
MRU 46.441602
MUR 53.81729
MVR 17.8918
MWK 2010.174862
MXN 20.713597
MYR 4.558523
MZN 73.953739
NAD 19.477256
NGN 1569.545119
NIO 42.495316
NOK 11.075049
NPR 173.060536
NZD 1.982642
OMR 0.441597
PAB 1.157018
PEN 4.02618
PGK 4.989851
PHP 69.404876
PKR 323.1135
PLN 4.275585
PYG 7556.680787
QAR 4.217668
RON 5.093719
RSD 117.69304
RUB 95.988502
RWF 1688.453967
SAR 4.345607
SBD 9.317929
SCR 16.627341
SDG 695.518442
SEK 10.812706
SGD 1.484085
SHP 0.868251
SLE 28.439904
SLL 24267.343207
SOS 661.382882
SRD 43.383087
STD 23953.110446
STN 24.89862
SVC 10.123276
SYP 128.185157
SZL 19.477247
THB 37.962609
TJS 11.112752
TMT 4.062011
TND 3.366536
TOP 2.786423
TRY 51.244872
TTD 7.84963
TWD 37.032963
TZS 2993.463438
UAH 50.684352
UGX 4373.236539
USD 1.157268
UYU 46.622062
UZS 14112.88327
VES 526.198902
VND 30450.034804
VUV 137.756939
WST 3.175735
XAF 655.853838
XAG 0.017004
XAU 0.000257
XCD 3.127575
XCG 2.085136
XDR 0.816864
XOF 660.225535
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.128291
ZAR 19.821112
ZMK 10416.804592
ZMW 22.590447
ZWL 372.639814
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSD

    -0.2420

    22.658

    -1.07%

  • CMSC

    -0.2000

    22.65

    -0.88%

  • RYCEF

    -0.6100

    15.99

    -3.81%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.79

    +0.23%

  • RIO

    -2.5000

    83.15

    -3.01%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.33

    -0.63%

  • GSK

    -0.5300

    51.84

    -1.02%

  • BTI

    -1.3500

    57.37

    -2.35%

  • RELX

    -0.4600

    33.36

    -1.38%

  • JRI

    -0.3900

    11.77

    -3.31%

  • AZN

    -5.3300

    183.6

    -2.9%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    68.3

    -2.28%

  • NGG

    -3.5400

    81.99

    -4.32%

  • BP

    -1.0800

    44.78

    -2.41%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

S.Yamamoto--JT