The Japan Times - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

EUR -
AED 4.330578
AFN 75.468553
ALL 95.370831
AMD 434.26718
ANG 2.110613
AOA 1082.496254
ARS 1649.279971
AUD 1.625347
AWG 2.125489
AZN 2.009303
BAM 1.955202
BBD 2.368676
BDT 144.305864
BGN 1.967008
BHD 0.444064
BIF 3500.4294
BMD 1.179189
BND 1.491244
BOB 8.126515
BRL 5.795828
BSD 1.17604
BTN 111.057033
BWP 15.789171
BYN 3.323484
BYR 23112.111202
BZD 2.365277
CAD 1.612129
CDF 2670.864298
CHF 0.916177
CLF 0.026704
CLP 1050.508704
CNY 8.019372
CNH 8.014083
COP 4394.855841
CRC 540.634648
CUC 1.179189
CUP 31.248518
CVE 110.231286
CZK 24.334582
DJF 209.425947
DKK 7.476537
DOP 69.938609
DZD 156.038276
EGP 62.195977
ERN 17.68784
ETB 183.631137
FJD 2.574218
FKP 0.865474
GBP 0.864889
GEL 3.154379
GGP 0.865474
GHS 13.247948
GIP 0.865474
GMD 86.674958
GNF 10318.844
GTQ 8.979254
GYD 246.064742
HKD 9.234999
HNL 31.264438
HRK 7.538916
HTG 153.972908
HUF 353.981307
IDR 20491.303919
ILS 3.421187
IMP 0.865474
INR 111.345548
IQD 1540.628801
IRR 1546506.829043
ISK 143.873347
JEP 0.865474
JMD 185.35331
JOD 0.836092
JPY 184.753623
KES 151.883547
KGS 103.085327
KHR 4718.556838
KMF 492.90156
KPW 1061.251335
KRW 1723.751231
KWD 0.36279
KYD 0.9801
KZT 543.543758
LAK 25791.111834
LBP 105315.489444
LKR 378.634195
LRD 215.803997
LSL 19.293799
LTL 3.48184
LVL 0.71328
LYD 7.436725
MAD 10.75591
MDL 20.110849
MGA 4912.497521
MKD 61.621153
MMK 2476.100645
MNT 4223.124889
MOP 9.4824
MRU 47.006623
MUR 55.210091
MVR 18.163925
MWK 2038.876413
MXN 20.255648
MYR 4.623647
MZN 75.362436
NAD 19.293799
NGN 1609.593864
NIO 43.276764
NOK 10.859513
NPR 177.691653
NZD 1.976185
OMR 0.453611
PAB 1.17604
PEN 4.066156
PGK 5.193412
PHP 71.358689
PKR 327.765953
PLN 4.239717
PYG 7183.802847
QAR 4.298685
RON 5.21945
RSD 117.334114
RUB 87.543025
RWF 1724.072695
SAR 4.44258
SBD 9.456429
SCR 17.539736
SDG 708.107537
SEK 10.86706
SGD 1.494509
SHP 0.880384
SLE 29.067455
SLL 24727.006491
SOS 672.094441
SRD 44.100547
STD 24406.83871
STN 24.492509
SVC 10.290853
SYP 130.375396
SZL 19.281103
THB 37.973479
TJS 10.972544
TMT 4.127163
TND 3.415955
TOP 2.839205
TRY 53.473293
TTD 7.970562
TWD 36.927538
TZS 3063.662984
UAH 51.6595
UGX 4406.652233
USD 1.179189
UYU 46.905654
UZS 14265.63688
VES 588.693738
VND 31022.113342
VUV 139.685143
WST 3.192143
XAF 655.756438
XAG 0.014675
XAU 0.00025
XCD 3.186819
XCG 2.119552
XDR 0.815551
XOF 655.756438
XPF 119.331742
YER 281.384102
ZAR 19.315959
ZMK 10614.123377
ZMW 22.390152
ZWL 379.698489
  • JRI

    0.0000

    13.15

    0%

  • BCC

    -2.0900

    70.67

    -2.96%

  • RIO

    2.2700

    105.38

    +2.15%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4100

    16.37

    -2.5%

  • CMSC

    0.1400

    23.11

    +0.61%

  • CMSD

    0.1140

    23.534

    +0.48%

  • NGG

    0.9800

    86.89

    +1.13%

  • BCE

    -0.4300

    24.14

    -1.78%

  • RBGPF

    0.7000

    63.61

    +1.1%

  • VOD

    0.5100

    16.2

    +3.15%

  • BTI

    0.2000

    58.28

    +0.34%

  • GSK

    -0.0900

    50.41

    -0.18%

  • AZN

    0.3300

    182.85

    +0.18%

  • BP

    -0.4700

    43.34

    -1.08%

  • RELX

    0.0759

    33.58

    +0.23%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

S.Yamamoto--JT