The Japan Times - 'Green dilemma': China's solar boom hurt birds, says study

EUR -
AED 4.289601
AFN 77.080481
ALL 92.187425
AMD 426.583054
ANG 2.09027
AOA 1070.95487
ARS 1748.580493
AUD 1.641909
AWG 2.102202
AZN 1.988021
BAM 1.954001
BBD 2.353754
BDT 142.810997
BGN 1.981169
BHD 0.440306
BIF 3483.232019
BMD 1.16789
BND 1.485477
BOB 13.480938
BRL 6.066837
BSD 1.168659
BTN 111.788456
BWP 15.690029
BYN 3.554604
BYR 22890.644617
BZD 2.350407
CAD 1.610579
CDF 2656.949703
CHF 0.934778
CLF 0.02737
CLP 1077.191349
CNY 7.852017
CNH 7.854183
COP 3593.889599
CRC 529.523942
CUC 1.16789
CUP 30.949086
CVE 110.7452
CZK 24.12943
DJF 207.557599
DKK 7.47543
DOP 68.916981
DZD 155.104036
EGP 59.420376
ERN 17.51835
ETB 190.891
FJD 2.569125
FKP 0.858416
GBP 0.856822
GEL 3.042387
GGP 0.858416
GHS 12.992763
GIP 0.858416
GMD 85.255581
GNF 10251.155757
GTQ 8.917944
GYD 244.401322
HKD 9.160404
HNL 31.335828
HRK 7.534638
HTG 152.893853
HUF 364.705781
IDR 20666.981997
ILS 3.500925
IMP 0.858416
INR 111.851217
IQD 1530.923653
IRR 1605352.44047
ISK 142.02412
JEP 0.858416
JMD 184.892984
JOD 0.828063
JPY 185.805478
KES 151.194524
KGS 102.13093
KHR 4724.1149
KMF 492.849684
KPW 1051.101371
KRW 1628.844271
KWD 0.360014
KYD 0.973933
KZT 532.561211
LAK 26248.328219
LBP 104584.552416
LKR 385.594989
LRD 212.118044
LSL 18.849908
LTL 3.448475
LVL 0.706445
LYD 7.421996
MAD 10.807362
MDL 20.066132
MGA 4994.531148
MKD 61.464478
MMK 2452.111708
MNT 4202.533275
MOP 9.441493
MRU 46.867958
MUR 54.48238
MVR 18.055874
MWK 2028.625054
MXN 19.800289
MYR 4.724821
MZN 74.634002
NAD 18.849545
NGN 1574.595587
NIO 43.011332
NOK 10.921366
NPR 178.860964
NZD 1.966575
OMR 0.449047
PAB 1.168654
PEN 3.917119
PGK 5.254254
PHP 72.193116
PKR 324.177103
PLN 4.31582
PYG 7036.673817
QAR 4.260143
RON 5.251187
RSD 117.367122
RUB 96.678114
RWF 1717.870292
SAR 4.387334
SBD 9.380794
SCR 16.222246
SDG 702.493492
SEK 11.071685
SGD 1.485587
SHP 0.86525
SLE 28.736515
SLL 24490.069112
SOS 667.896681
SRD 44.017649
STD 24172.965691
STN 24.478203
SVC 10.225938
SYP 15184.906079
SZL 18.852213
THB 38.3884
TJS 10.798338
TMT 4.087615
TND 3.399144
TOP 2.811999
TRY 56.07846
TTD 7.91988
TWD 37.226255
TZS 3089.674108
UAH 52.128512
UGX 4347.036051
USD 1.16789
UYU 46.838492
UZS 13836.738068
VES 906.801616
VND 30484.265602
VUV 138.063442
WST 3.187493
XAF 655.373411
XAG 0.017146
XAU 0.000258
XCD 3.156281
XCG 2.106206
XDR 0.825759
XOF 655.379018
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.877492
ZAR 18.834561
ZMK 10512.410895
ZMW 22.057886
ZWL 376.060114
  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    69.35

    +0.5%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1800

    20.42

    -0.88%

  • CMSC

    -0.0799

    21.28

    -0.38%

  • NGG

    -0.0400

    80.62

    -0.05%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    23.78

    +0.34%

  • GSK

    -0.9200

    51.96

    -1.77%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    35.38

    +0.79%

  • BTI

    0.7200

    56.7

    +1.27%

  • RIO

    1.7300

    102.17

    +1.69%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    16.01

    -1%

  • AZN

    -0.4600

    164.49

    -0.28%

  • BCC

    -1.3600

    81.77

    -1.66%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    21.12

    -0.14%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.41

    +0.24%

  • BP

    1.4100

    45.14

    +3.12%

'Green dilemma': China's solar boom hurt birds, says study

'Green dilemma': China's solar boom hurt birds, says study

The global push for solar energy expansion could carry hidden biodiversity costs, according to a study on China published in the journal Science on Thursday.

Text size:

According to the research spanning more than 2,300 Chinese counties, pro-solar policies led to reductions in bird diversity as cropland and grassland were rapidly cleared for development.

The authors called it an example of a "green dilemma" pitting carbon reduction against conservation.

"The main message is not to slow the renewable energy transition, but to make solar development more ecologically informed," first author Huiming Zhang, of the Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, told AFP.

China's goal to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060 has seen it embark on a renewables revolution.

By 2024, its solar footprint reached an estimated 4,520 square kilometers (1,745 square miles) -- equivalent in size to the US state of Rhode Island -- and solar energy is projected to constitute 45 percent of its energy mix by 2060.

Choosing solar locations in China is not based on sunny locations and available land, but rather on government "Five-Year Plans" to promote economic development in certain regions.

Zhang and his colleagues exploited these variations in solar expansion policy in 2,344 counties across China from 2014 to 2023, while also accounting for national trends, weather, socioeconomic conditions, land cover and birdwatching effort.

This data was paired with citizen science records to understand the impact on bird diversity.

Their findings revealed a negative trade-off, with increased policy stringency consistently associated with decreased bird biodiversity, though the effect was moderate.

The effects were stronger in wealthier and non-desert regions.

Both resident and migratory birds suffered significant declines, but species that were native to mountain habitats poorly suited to solar farms were unaffected.

- 'Inferior greening' -

The push for solar farms in China was accompanied by greening efforts to satisfy environmental requirements, but the authors identified what they called "inferior greening" -- where the total amount of leafiness may go up but because it was too homogeneous, the ecological quality went down.

Writing in a related commentary, Yuanning Liang of Peking University said "birds serve as an effective indicator group for large-scale biodiversity assessment" because they are among the few animal groups for which abundance data over time and space is readily available.

Although the authors studied solar power, the problems they identified equally apply to other forms of renewable energy such as wind farm expansion, she added.

"The next step is to move from biodiversity measurement to valuation by linking changes in bird diversity to ecosystem services and conservation values," Liang said.

"Without such valuation, policy analysis gives insufficient weight to conservation, and benefit-cost analysis can understate the social cost of development."

The research team offered a number of recommendations, including directing large solar projects toward locations with lower ecological conflict, greater assessments of each site, and limiting land conversion in productive, habitat-rich regions.

"Clean energy development and biodiversity conservation do not have to come at each other's expense, but careful siting and biodiversity safeguards are essential," said Zhang.

H.Hayashi--JT