The Japan Times - No 'human era' in Earth's geological history, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.181853
AFN 71.737344
ALL 94.207554
AMD 418.322713
ANG 2.038723
AOA 1044.183684
ARS 1684.219261
AUD 1.652043
AWG 2.051075
AZN 1.935121
BAM 1.954504
BBD 2.295478
BDT 140.187076
BGN 1.925397
BHD 0.429715
BIF 3384.956268
BMD 1.138695
BND 1.474722
BOB 7.87578
BRL 5.889215
BSD 1.139745
BTN 106.97609
BWP 15.488733
BYN 3.305509
BYR 22318.42614
BZD 2.292181
CAD 1.615985
CDF 2581.998711
CHF 0.922298
CLF 0.02669
CLP 1050.435044
CNY 7.741021
CNH 7.746498
COP 3916.712983
CRC 517.457002
CUC 1.138695
CUP 30.175423
CVE 110.191959
CZK 24.252899
DJF 202.95547
DKK 7.474822
DOP 66.965612
DZD 151.930292
EGP 56.43875
ERN 17.080428
ETB 183.746703
FJD 2.580392
FKP 0.862766
GBP 0.862704
GEL 3.011847
GGP 0.862766
GHS 12.850482
GIP 0.862766
GMD 83.124857
GNF 9986.380487
GTQ 8.695236
GYD 238.521895
HKD 8.929682
HNL 30.494786
HRK 7.533497
HTG 148.96126
HUF 354.082932
IDR 20310.906483
ILS 3.41842
IMP 0.862766
INR 107.447907
IQD 1493.010352
IRR 1565990.589223
ISK 143.999498
JEP 0.862766
JMD 179.501017
JOD 0.807318
JPY 184.189074
KES 147.427206
KGS 99.579138
KHR 4574.967464
KMF 494.193463
KPW 1024.826089
KRW 1749.752789
KWD 0.352551
KYD 0.94977
KZT 552.993446
LAK 25016.417765
LBP 102061.847887
LKR 383.106057
LRD 207.60239
LSL 18.734582
LTL 3.362271
LVL 0.688786
LYD 7.31615
MAD 10.687216
MDL 20.207605
MGA 4820.80451
MKD 61.594172
MMK 2390.41825
MNT 4076.111956
MOP 9.206597
MRU 45.48585
MUR 54.338532
MVR 17.593515
MWK 1976.290008
MXN 19.940761
MYR 4.655003
MZN 72.758607
NAD 18.734582
NGN 1569.96453
NIO 41.942198
NOK 11.324352
NPR 171.161545
NZD 2.018867
OMR 0.437826
PAB 1.139745
PEN 3.886424
PGK 5.001685
PHP 69.797448
PKR 317.183953
PLN 4.287814
PYG 6956.388929
QAR 4.154446
RON 5.241443
RSD 117.302246
RUB 89.917486
RWF 1669.093634
SAR 4.280063
SBD 9.16872
SCR 16.007589
SDG 683.217725
SEK 11.087566
SGD 1.474047
SHP 0.850151
SLE 28.229626
SLL 23877.873405
SOS 651.368238
SRD 42.681693
STD 23568.691856
STN 24.483771
SVC 9.97239
SYP 125.86237
SZL 18.723589
THB 38.053992
TJS 10.548108
TMT 3.985433
TND 3.378061
TOP 2.741705
TRY 53.089497
TTD 7.745866
TWD 36.281069
TZS 2994.762678
UAH 51.15779
UGX 4183.227131
USD 1.138695
UYU 45.749675
UZS 13689.925577
VES 706.848451
VND 29947.684055
VUV 135.743206
WST 3.166577
XAF 655.522484
XAG 0.019442
XAU 0.000281
XCD 3.07738
XCG 2.054038
XDR 0.81526
XOF 655.522484
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.721169
ZAR 18.754541
ZMK 10249.624729
ZMW 20.530391
ZWL 366.659393
  • CMSC

    -0.1160

    21.93

    -0.53%

  • JRI

    0.2100

    12.79

    +1.64%

  • BCC

    1.2600

    81.02

    +1.56%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.77

    -0.73%

  • BCE

    -0.2800

    22.92

    -1.22%

  • GSK

    0.6100

    52.5

    +1.16%

  • NGG

    -0.4100

    83.01

    -0.49%

  • AZN

    2.7300

    188.41

    +1.45%

  • RIO

    -1.3700

    93.74

    -1.46%

  • BTI

    0.2800

    62.76

    +0.45%

  • RBGPF

    3.7000

    65

    +5.69%

  • RYCEF

    0.3900

    18.39

    +2.12%

  • VOD

    0.0300

    13.89

    +0.22%

  • BP

    -0.5900

    37.13

    -1.59%

  • RELX

    0.4200

    31.34

    +1.34%

No 'human era' in Earth's geological history, scientists say
No 'human era' in Earth's geological history, scientists say / Photo: Peter POWER - AFP

No 'human era' in Earth's geological history, scientists say

A top panel of geologists has decided not to grant the 'human age' its own distinct place in Earth's geological timeline after disagreeing over when exactly our era might have begun.

Text size:

After 15 years of deliberation, a team of scientists made the case that humankind has so fundamentally altered the natural world that a new phase of Earth's existence -- a new epoch -- has already begun.

Soaring greenhouse gases, the spread of microplastics, decimation of other species, and fallout from nuclear tests -- all were submitted as evidence that the world entered the Anthropocene, or era of humans, in the mid-20th century.

But the proposal was rejected in a contentious vote that has been upheld by the International Union of Geological Sciences, the field's governing body said in a statement published on its website on Thursday.

The decision "to reject the proposal for an Anthropocene Epoch as a formal unit of the Geologic Time Scale is approved", it said.

There is no avenue for appeal, though some involved in the voting committee have raised allegations over the conduct of the ballot and a perceived lack of due process.

The union denied these assertions and called the outcome "a decisive rejection of the Anthropocene proposal" by the field's pre-eminent experts.

There were four votes in favour, 12 against and three abstentions, it added.

Despite this, the Anthropocene would endure as a widely used term: "It will remain an invaluable descriptor of human impact on the Earth system," the union said.

- 'Missed opportunity' -

In 2009 scientists began an enquiry that ultimately concluded that the Holocene epoch -- which began 11,700 years ago as the last ice age ended -- gave way to the Anthropocene around 1950.

They gathered a trove of evidence to show this, including traces of radioactive material found in the layered sediment of lakes, the global upheaval of plants and animals, and omnipresent "forever chemicals".

But opponents argued mankind had been reshaping the planet long before the 1950s, pointing to defining moments like the advent of farming and the industrial revolution.

Martin Head, who was part of the team that advocated for the Anthropocene, said there was "a myriad of geological signals" and lamented the way the process was handled.

"I feel this has been a missed opportunity to recognise and endorse a simple reality, that our planet left its natural functioning state in the mid-20th century," Head, a professor of earth sciences at Brock University in Canada, told AFP.

There was no disagreement that 'the age of man' had resulted in profound planetary changes, said Erle Ellis, an environmental scientist critical of the Anthropocene proposal.

But scientists weren't convinced this impact represented an epoch, no less one that definitively began only seven decades ago, said Ellis, professor of geography and environmental systems at the University of Maryland.

"The truth is, there was never a need for a firm boundary. It just wasn't the critical thing," he told AFP earlier this month after the proposal was first voted down.

S.Yamada--JT