The Japan Times - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

EUR -
AED 4.225536
AFN 74.787914
ALL 93.340449
AMD 421.450843
AOA 1055.089999
ARS 1718.9768
AUD 1.639962
AWG 2.073936
AZN 1.954509
BAM 1.956036
BBD 2.32096
BDT 142.297166
BHD 0.434547
BIF 3409.355741
BMD 1.150589
BND 1.477898
BOB 14.029692
BRL 5.855323
BSD 1.152339
BTN 109.809247
BWP 15.672754
BYN 3.368577
BYR 22551.540548
BZD 2.317659
CAD 1.618071
CDF 2602.63217
CHF 0.932512
CLF 0.026954
CLP 1064.306821
CNY 7.769468
CNH 7.771434
COP 3733.119891
CRC 523.456324
CUC 1.150589
CUP 30.490603
CVE 110.278304
CZK 24.205519
DJF 205.204755
DKK 7.475249
DOP 66.847193
DZD 153.027114
EGP 57.761807
ERN 17.258832
ETB 185.995213
FJD 2.550165
FKP 0.856466
GBP 0.857016
GEL 3.003167
GGP 0.856466
GHS 13.465624
GIP 0.856466
GMD 85.143351
GNF 10119.220751
GTQ 8.792061
GYD 241.46913
HKD 9.023786
HNL 30.887323
HRK 7.534283
HTG 150.670141
HUF 363.753472
IDR 20743.965538
ILS 3.499918
IMP 0.856466
INR 109.684828
IQD 1509.56899
IRR 1582347.251877
ISK 142.005874
JEP 0.856466
JMD 182.539641
JOD 0.815766
JPY 181.438069
KES 148.828915
KGS 100.619085
KHR 4656.622468
KMF 492.452069
KRW 1647.154159
KWD 0.356105
KYD 0.960308
KZT 546.631193
LAK 26063.144177
LBP 103197.3525
LKR 386.906675
LRD 208.005093
LSL 19.004993
LTL 3.397389
LVL 0.69598
LYD 7.344886
MAD 10.744696
MDL 20.120427
MGA 4908.528158
MKD 61.532423
MMK 2415.852808
MNT 4124.054667
MOP 9.308242
MRU 46.151966
MUR 54.123901
MVR 17.77659
MWK 1998.215008
MXN 19.912549
MYR 4.711637
MZN 73.520492
NAD 19.004828
NGN 1570.047266
NIO 42.405116
NOK 10.969426
NPR 175.692905
NZD 1.962001
OMR 0.442398
PAB 1.152339
PEN 3.89207
PGK 5.085547
PHP 70.409176
PKR 319.97992
PLN 4.312131
PYG 6873.829237
QAR 4.200907
RON 5.245763
RSD 117.368104
RUB 92.514144
RWF 1689.881831
SAR 4.307953
SBD 9.286582
SCR 16.93683
SDG 690.353503
SEK 11.003773
SGD 1.476504
SLE 28.131763
SOS 658.570862
SRD 43.499141
STD 23814.865202
STN 24.502636
SVC 10.083129
SZL 19.008128
THB 38.459009
TJS 10.642084
TMT 4.027061
TND 3.381508
TRY 54.716199
TTD 7.813875
TWD 37.2693
TZS 3043.888404
UAH 51.690362
UGX 4312.520249
USD 1.150589
UYU 46.345591
UZS 13816.546703
VES 860.469449
VND 30239.199638
VUV 137.085532
WST 3.143657
XAF 656.027589
XAG 0.01946
XAU 0.000283
XCD 3.109523
XCG 2.076832
XDR 0.815891
XOF 656.036142
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.273903
ZAR 18.996284
ZMK 10356.679715
ZMW 21.656424
ZWL 370.489125
  • RBGPF

    1.7800

    70.99

    +2.51%

  • RYCEF

    0.6500

    20.2

    +3.22%

  • GSK

    -0.1800

    51.51

    -0.35%

  • RIO

    -0.9500

    95.9

    -0.99%

  • NGG

    -0.1100

    79.86

    -0.14%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    21.76

    -0.37%

  • AZN

    -11.6700

    157.97

    -7.39%

  • BTI

    -1.0900

    59.56

    -1.83%

  • VOD

    -0.1700

    15.61

    -1.09%

  • RELX

    0.7400

    36.16

    +2.05%

  • BP

    -0.9600

    44.26

    -2.17%

  • BCE

    0.1100

    21.79

    +0.5%

  • BCC

    6.6500

    83.03

    +8.01%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    22.02

    -0.41%

  • JRI

    -0.1400

    12.82

    -1.09%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: SAMUEL CORUM - AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

Y.Ishikawa--JT