The Japan Times - Lots of low- and no-cost ways to halt global warming

EUR -
AED 4.224876
AFN 72.462986
ALL 96.160604
AMD 434.099231
ANG 2.058963
AOA 1054.738043
ARS 1606.038123
AUD 1.628909
AWG 2.073245
AZN 1.957787
BAM 1.959215
BBD 2.316138
BDT 141.107219
BGN 1.966056
BHD 0.434221
BIF 3416.109293
BMD 1.150205
BND 1.471035
BOB 7.974972
BRL 6.040894
BSD 1.150005
BTN 106.071837
BWP 15.680472
BYN 3.425836
BYR 22544.020924
BZD 2.312943
CAD 1.573084
CDF 2605.214492
CHF 0.906057
CLF 0.026511
CLP 1046.813004
CNY 8.001115
CNH 7.92826
COP 4260.842959
CRC 540.146332
CUC 1.150205
CUP 30.480436
CVE 111.13859
CZK 24.454509
DJF 204.414853
DKK 7.471767
DOP 70.564391
DZD 152.131445
EGP 60.230841
ERN 17.253077
ETB 181.013531
FJD 2.547595
FKP 0.868334
GBP 0.863925
GEL 3.128823
GGP 0.868334
GHS 12.519984
GIP 0.868334
GMD 84.515954
GNF 10093.05076
GTQ 8.814443
GYD 240.721742
HKD 9.006578
HNL 30.561304
HRK 7.539937
HTG 150.724067
HUF 391.404502
IDR 19517.831177
ILS 3.591441
IMP 0.868334
INR 106.132132
IQD 1506.768745
IRR 1519478.512409
ISK 143.211796
JEP 0.868334
JMD 180.895354
JOD 0.815474
JPY 183.113233
KES 148.840282
KGS 100.58578
KHR 4622.10278
KMF 493.437605
KPW 1035.184626
KRW 1714.570528
KWD 0.353216
KYD 0.958279
KZT 555.322921
LAK 24700.655091
LBP 103000.87101
LKR 358.097383
LRD 210.775166
LSL 19.277199
LTL 3.396257
LVL 0.695748
LYD 7.3728
MAD 10.806191
MDL 20.009056
MGA 4779.102216
MKD 61.709926
MMK 2415.019418
MNT 4107.710362
MOP 9.274449
MRU 46.140499
MUR 53.806333
MVR 17.782217
MWK 1997.906655
MXN 20.371795
MYR 4.520887
MZN 73.509782
NAD 19.277204
NGN 1571.67499
NIO 42.235365
NOK 11.132226
NPR 169.721992
NZD 1.964872
OMR 0.442264
PAB 1.150015
PEN 3.943482
PGK 4.948754
PHP 68.636185
PKR 321.223553
PLN 4.272265
PYG 7464.01199
QAR 4.190485
RON 5.09484
RSD 117.426723
RUB 93.449256
RWF 1678.149313
SAR 4.316316
SBD 9.261061
SCR 16.378688
SDG 691.272965
SEK 10.749024
SGD 1.470163
SHP 0.862952
SLE 28.293004
SLL 24119.239327
SOS 657.347107
SRD 43.214935
STD 23806.924333
STN 24.844431
SVC 10.06263
SYP 127.126407
SZL 19.277227
THB 37.243559
TJS 11.039641
TMT 4.031469
TND 3.35973
TOP 2.769417
TRY 50.804333
TTD 7.798663
TWD 36.812088
TZS 2996.284814
UAH 50.697321
UGX 4341.606456
USD 1.150205
UYU 46.751909
UZS 13923.233407
VES 513.274734
VND 30238.893372
VUV 137.524572
WST 3.146058
XAF 657.108248
XAG 0.014306
XAU 0.00023
XCD 3.108487
XCG 2.072531
XDR 0.819555
XOF 661.945035
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.323586
ZAR 19.240229
ZMK 10353.228016
ZMW 22.395236
ZWL 370.365589
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    22.93

    -0.26%

  • AZN

    1.9670

    191.867

    +1.03%

  • RIO

    2.1000

    89.93

    +2.34%

  • GSK

    0.6900

    54.08

    +1.28%

  • BTI

    1.3050

    61.235

    +2.13%

  • NGG

    -0.1000

    90.8

    -0.11%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.99

    0%

  • RELX

    0.3900

    34.53

    +1.13%

  • BCE

    0.6971

    25.945

    +2.69%

  • BCC

    2.3550

    72.355

    +3.25%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.57

    -0.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1500

    16.4

    -0.91%

  • BP

    0.4500

    43.12

    +1.04%

  • VOD

    0.2250

    14.635

    +1.54%

Lots of low- and no-cost ways to halt global warming
Lots of low- and no-cost ways to halt global warming

Lots of low- and no-cost ways to halt global warming

Not only do we have the tools to slash emissions and curb global warming by 2030, but half of available carbon-cutting options are cost-free or very cheap, UN climate experts say.

Text size:

There is no silver bullet, but a mosaic of actions -- from ramping up solar and wind technology, to economy-wide energy efficiencies -- were identified by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as low hanging fruit.

The IPCC said humanity has less than three years to halt the rise of planet-warming carbon emissions, and less than a decade to slash them by 43 percent from 2019 levels to give us a shot at capping global warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius.

But current policies support continued fossil fuel use and are taking the world in the wrong direction, the IPCC said, in a flagship report on how to avoid catastrophic warming, published on Monday.

Despite the tight timeline, the IPCC said the existing carbon-cutting potential across sectors "is sufficient to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions to half of the current level or less".

While this requires taking action across a wide range of options, the report said that measures that are low-cost "make up more than half of this potential and are available for all sectors".

"The market benefits of some options exceed their costs," it added.

- Wind and solar -

In 2019, total emissions were 59 billion tonnes, or gigatonnes, of CO2 or its equivalent in other greenhouse gases.

The range of options identified would enable a reduction in emissions of 31 to 44 gigatonnes by 2030.

There are four key areas where the total potential for carbon reduction is highest between now and the end of the decade -- solar and wind energy, reductions in deforestation, and restoration of forests and other ecosystems.

Of those, solar and wind are also among the cheapest options available thanks to the steep drop in the unit costs of these technologies -- down 85 and 55 percent respectively between 2010 and 2019, according to the report.

This "demonstrates that with the right policy incentives and economic frameworks, climate change mitigation can be financed at scale and relatively quickly," said Michael Wilkins, head of the Centre For Climate Finance And Investment at Imperial College Business School.

More investment in solar could see an emissions reduction of between two and seven gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent by 2030. Wind energy could save between 2.1 and 5.6 gigatonnes.

Most of that potential, according to the report, would have essentially negative lifetime costs because they are cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives.

The reduction of methane emissions in the production of fossil energies is also mostly low cost.

Other energy generation options have a lower overall potential, with a higher cost, such as nuclear power and hydroelectricity.

- Food and forests -

Protecting and restoring natural habitats is the second most significant area for reducing CO2 emissions.

Forests are crucial for absorbing CO2 generated by human activities, and the IPCC found that limiting deforestation and the destruction of grasslands could reduce net emissions between three and almost eight gigatonnes, largely at a low cost.

Restoring these types of ecosystems would save one to five gigatonnes. But action in this category would be at the more expensive end of the range considered by the IPCC.

Shifting to "sustainable" diets and reducing waste food could save more than two gigatonnes, the IPCC said, but it did not give a cost estimate because of wide global variability and a lack of data.

- 'Fair balance' -

The transport sector is notable for the fact that no single option has a particularly large potential to reduce emissions.

But almost all of the potential measures -- switching to public transport and bicycles, fuel efficiency in road vehicles, shipping and aviation -- are associated with negative costs.

In the construction sector, reduction in energy demand and efficiencies in things like lighting are seen as the lowest cost options, albeit with limited potential.

The construction of new highly energy efficient buildings have the greatest potential (between less than one and more than two gigatonnes), although costs are towards the higher end.

In industry, meanwhile, most of the options -- beyond improving energy efficiency and cutting other greenhouse gas emissions -- are associated with higher costs.

But the sector still has significant potential for reducing emissions, in particular the switch to less carbon-intensive energy sources.

"The costs of climate protection are economically absolutely feasible when examined on a global scale and over generations," said Elmar Kriegler, of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, who was one of the IPCC authors.

But, he said, costs vary significantly from region to region, with developing countries facing a relatively higher price tag to move away from fossil fuels.

"That is why a fair balance is crucial, not only within individual countries but also internationally. Because one thing is clear: The benefits of climate protection clearly exceed its costs," he added.

M.Ito--JT