The Japan Times - Climate scorecard: good news and bad news

EUR -
AED 4.224876
AFN 72.462986
ALL 96.160604
AMD 434.099231
ANG 2.058963
AOA 1054.738043
ARS 1606.038123
AUD 1.628909
AWG 2.073245
AZN 1.957787
BAM 1.959215
BBD 2.316138
BDT 141.107219
BGN 1.966056
BHD 0.434221
BIF 3416.109293
BMD 1.150205
BND 1.471035
BOB 7.974972
BRL 6.040894
BSD 1.150005
BTN 106.071837
BWP 15.680472
BYN 3.425836
BYR 22544.020924
BZD 2.312943
CAD 1.573084
CDF 2605.214492
CHF 0.906057
CLF 0.026511
CLP 1046.813004
CNY 8.001115
CNH 7.92826
COP 4260.842959
CRC 540.146332
CUC 1.150205
CUP 30.480436
CVE 111.13859
CZK 24.454509
DJF 204.414853
DKK 7.471767
DOP 70.564391
DZD 152.131445
EGP 60.230841
ERN 17.253077
ETB 181.013531
FJD 2.547595
FKP 0.868334
GBP 0.863925
GEL 3.128823
GGP 0.868334
GHS 12.519984
GIP 0.868334
GMD 84.515954
GNF 10093.05076
GTQ 8.814443
GYD 240.721742
HKD 9.006578
HNL 30.561304
HRK 7.539937
HTG 150.724067
HUF 391.404502
IDR 19517.831177
ILS 3.591441
IMP 0.868334
INR 106.132132
IQD 1506.768745
IRR 1519478.512409
ISK 143.211796
JEP 0.868334
JMD 180.895354
JOD 0.815474
JPY 183.113233
KES 148.840282
KGS 100.58578
KHR 4622.10278
KMF 493.437605
KPW 1035.184626
KRW 1714.570528
KWD 0.353216
KYD 0.958279
KZT 555.322921
LAK 24700.655091
LBP 103000.87101
LKR 358.097383
LRD 210.775166
LSL 19.277199
LTL 3.396257
LVL 0.695748
LYD 7.3728
MAD 10.806191
MDL 20.009056
MGA 4779.102216
MKD 61.709926
MMK 2415.019418
MNT 4107.710362
MOP 9.274449
MRU 46.140499
MUR 53.806333
MVR 17.782217
MWK 1997.906655
MXN 20.371795
MYR 4.520887
MZN 73.509782
NAD 19.277204
NGN 1571.67499
NIO 42.235365
NOK 11.132226
NPR 169.721992
NZD 1.964872
OMR 0.442264
PAB 1.150015
PEN 3.943482
PGK 4.948754
PHP 68.636185
PKR 321.223553
PLN 4.272265
PYG 7464.01199
QAR 4.190485
RON 5.09484
RSD 117.426723
RUB 93.449256
RWF 1678.149313
SAR 4.316316
SBD 9.261061
SCR 16.378688
SDG 691.272965
SEK 10.749024
SGD 1.470163
SHP 0.862952
SLE 28.293004
SLL 24119.239327
SOS 657.347107
SRD 43.214935
STD 23806.924333
STN 24.844431
SVC 10.06263
SYP 127.126407
SZL 19.277227
THB 37.243559
TJS 11.039641
TMT 4.031469
TND 3.35973
TOP 2.769417
TRY 50.804333
TTD 7.798663
TWD 36.812088
TZS 2996.284814
UAH 50.697321
UGX 4341.606456
USD 1.150205
UYU 46.751909
UZS 13923.233407
VES 513.274734
VND 30238.893372
VUV 137.524572
WST 3.146058
XAF 657.108248
XAG 0.014306
XAU 0.00023
XCD 3.108487
XCG 2.072531
XDR 0.819555
XOF 661.945035
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.323586
ZAR 19.240229
ZMK 10353.228016
ZMW 22.395236
ZWL 370.365589
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1500

    16.4

    -0.91%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.94

    -0.22%

  • VOD

    0.2200

    14.63

    +1.5%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.56

    -0.24%

  • BCC

    2.2600

    72.26

    +3.13%

  • BCE

    0.6921

    25.94

    +2.67%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    22.95

    -0.17%

  • RIO

    2.2300

    90.06

    +2.48%

  • NGG

    -0.1000

    90.8

    -0.11%

  • RELX

    0.3700

    34.51

    +1.07%

  • BTI

    1.2850

    61.215

    +2.1%

  • AZN

    2.0400

    191.94

    +1.06%

  • BP

    0.4100

    43.08

    +0.95%

  • GSK

    0.7250

    54.115

    +1.34%

Climate scorecard: good news and bad news
Climate scorecard: good news and bad news

Climate scorecard: good news and bad news

The task is clear -- stop burning fossil fuels, radically reduce energy demand and slash all planet-warming emissions in order to keep the planet cool enough so humans, animals and plants can survive and thrive.

Text size:

So how do the actions of the world so far match up to the challenge?

Here is a rundown from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's handbook on how to halt global warming:

- Emissions growth is slowing -

While we are continuing to spew more carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere, the rate of that increase has slowed in recent years.

Emissions actually fell in 2020 -- by an estimated 5.8 percent compared to 2019 -- as governments around the world imposed unprecedented lockdowns to try to halt the spread of Covid-19.

Demand for energy shrank in almost all areas -- except residential buildings. International aviation emissions were down some 45 percent.

Meanwhile, at least 24 countries in the world have managed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and consumption-based CO2 pollution for a decade or more. Almost all are in Europe, although the list also includes the United States and Jamaica.

- But they need to fall, and fast -

Emissions have already rebounded from the pandemic.

Developing nations that have come from a low base per capita are seeing sharp increases.

And carbon footprints per person in rich countries remain stubbornly high, particularly in Australia, Canada.

- We have most of the means -

There are a range of low-carbon technologies to produce electricity and these are becoming cheaper, better and more widely used. These include solar photovoltaics (PV), onshore and offshore wind, and batteries.

"In many contexts solar PV and onshore wind power are now competitive with fossil-based generation," the report said.

Since 2010 emissions from coal have grown, but more slowly, as the US and Europe retired some old plants, while China added fewer new ones. A large number of planned coal plants around the world were either scrapped or converted so that they could also burn biomass.

- But we struggle to kick the dirty fuel habit -

All of the world's electricity will have to come from low-carbon generation by 2050 to meet the Paris Agreement global warming targets. This is "challenged" by growing electricity demand.

Currently, solar PV and wind generation technologies account for less than 10 percent of the market.

Despite coal's hefty C02 emissions, some countries and even international development banks continue to fund and develop new coal capacity.

- We can transform transport, buildings and industry -

Electrification is a "feasible, scalable and affordable" option to decarbonise mass transportation.

Electric vehicles (EVs) are the fastest-growing part of the automobile industry and if these cars and trucks are charged with low-carbon electricity they can significantly reduce emissions.

It is possible to make existing and new buildings in all parts of the world either nearly zero-energy or low-energy.

Most industrial processes in general can be decarbonised through a combination of technology using electricity and hydrogen, carbon capture and innovation in the circular use of materials (i.e. recycling and reusing).

- But change is slow -

Transport emissions grew at an average of two percent a year per between 2010 and 2019, due to continued "high travel demand, heavier vehicles, low efficiencies and car-centric development".

Beyond charging EVs with zero-emissions electricity, car manufacturing, shipping and aviation also need to be decarbonised, as do supply chains in general.

As for construction, the low ambition of government policies is a particular concern, for both existing buildings in developed countries and new buildings in developing ones.

The strong global demand for basic materials means industrial emissions continue to grow. This demand must be sharply reduced, alongside the rapid scale up of low-carbon innovations, otherwise there is a risk of locking in emissions "for decades to come".

- A crescendo of climate action -

An increasing number of countries say they plan to achieve "net-zero" C02, or greenhouse gas, emissions by mid-century.

Mandatory policies like pricing and regulation have expanded, while many businesses have promised to curb emissions.

Climate activism is growing, labour unions are starting to engage with the issues, while media coverage of climate change is increasing and becoming better at accurately reflecting the science.

- But action needs to happen faster -

Current national pledges under the Paris Agreement will not limit global warming to the target of 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Many net-zero targets are "ambiguously defined" and the policies to achieve them are not yet in place.

Low-carbon alternatives need much more investment, while "status quo interests" are acting to block progress.

People are also subjected to misinformation on online and in traditional media that has "undermined significantly" understanding of the science.

S.Yamada--JT