The Japan Times - Most nations get low marks on 'net-zero' climate plans

EUR -
AED 4.235825
AFN 75.545802
ALL 93.537535
AMD 423.305618
AOA 1058.811708
ARS 1726.050045
AUD 1.636636
AWG 2.076101
AZN 1.961033
BAM 1.95855
BBD 2.32222
BDT 142.730393
BHD 0.434886
BIF 3452.671024
BMD 1.153389
BND 1.479477
BOB 14.003296
BRL 5.934074
BSD 1.152999
BTN 110.036059
BWP 15.679013
BYN 3.398271
BYR 22606.431288
BZD 2.318956
CAD 1.622248
CDF 2606.660577
CHF 0.933046
CLF 0.026726
CLP 1055.304781
CNY 7.789473
CNH 7.782898
COP 3701.468641
CRC 522.824977
CUC 1.153389
CUP 30.564818
CVE 110.898381
CZK 24.174001
DJF 204.980328
DKK 7.474932
DOP 67.343891
DZD 153.308454
EGP 57.874195
ERN 17.30084
ETB 184.37006
FJD 2.552393
FKP 0.858551
GBP 0.857378
GEL 3.016125
GGP 0.858551
GHS 13.511962
GIP 0.858551
GMD 85.350816
GNF 10132.525167
GTQ 8.794347
GYD 241.385765
HKD 9.045745
HNL 30.980157
HRK 7.535899
HTG 150.750346
HUF 360.8921
IDR 20725.88762
ILS 3.473801
IMP 0.858551
INR 109.684501
IQD 1510.94005
IRR 1586054.532116
ISK 141.797162
JEP 0.858551
JMD 182.305956
JOD 0.817769
JPY 181.856081
KES 149.249433
KGS 100.863577
KHR 4671.226492
KMF 493.651222
KRW 1647.050939
KWD 0.356917
KYD 0.960828
KZT 543.160821
LAK 26066.599277
LBP 103286.016357
LKR 387.123519
LRD 209.080658
LSL 19.065344
LTL 3.405659
LVL 0.697674
LYD 7.341378
MAD 10.751869
MDL 20.182899
MGA 4953.807106
MKD 61.54284
MMK 2421.733025
MNT 4134.092669
MOP 9.314976
MRU 46.262325
MUR 53.621184
MVR 17.831455
MWK 2003.437477
MXN 19.901041
MYR 4.723245
MZN 73.697531
NAD 19.065769
NGN 1572.5428
NIO 42.429571
NOK 11.006044
NPR 176.060187
NZD 1.961494
OMR 0.443477
PAB 1.153019
PEN 3.915185
PGK 5.098267
PHP 70.350996
PKR 320.440363
PLN 4.295418
PYG 6874.681812
QAR 4.204969
RON 5.24954
RSD 117.355054
RUB 92.995645
RWF 1693.175568
SAR 4.318554
SBD 9.309186
SCR 15.476883
SDG 692.597559
SEK 10.979563
SGD 1.478288
SLE 28.200099
SOS 658.925127
SRD 43.703089
STD 23872.830891
STN 24.91321
SVC 10.089165
SZL 19.065835
THB 38.33829
TJS 10.642103
TMT 4.036863
TND 3.39216
TRY 54.866503
TTD 7.82799
TWD 37.381464
TZS 3062.246425
UAH 51.556685
UGX 4317.987553
USD 1.153389
UYU 46.455425
UZS 13856.819878
VES 849.069652
VND 30292.041232
VUV 137.419199
WST 3.151308
XAF 656.879254
XAG 0.019387
XAU 0.000283
XCD 3.117093
XCG 2.078018
XDR 0.817877
XOF 654.547231
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.974351
ZAR 18.891917
ZMK 10381.891222
ZMW 21.817226
ZWL 371.390901
  • CMSC

    0.0300

    21.79

    +0.14%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    20.35

    +0.74%

  • GSK

    0.0200

    51.53

    +0.04%

  • RBGPF

    3.9500

    69.95

    +5.65%

  • BTI

    -0.4400

    59.12

    -0.74%

  • RIO

    3.1100

    99.01

    +3.14%

  • AZN

    -2.3500

    155.62

    -1.51%

  • BCE

    0.2100

    22

    +0.95%

  • NGG

    0.5600

    80.42

    +0.7%

  • BP

    -1.8200

    42.44

    -4.29%

  • BCC

    3.4600

    86.49

    +4%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.02

    0%

  • JRI

    -0.1000

    12.72

    -0.79%

  • RELX

    0.6400

    36.8

    +1.74%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    15.69

    +0.51%

Most nations get low marks on 'net-zero' climate plans
Most nations get low marks on 'net-zero' climate plans / Photo: Fabrice COFFRINI - AFP/File

Most nations get low marks on 'net-zero' climate plans

Nearly all of 35 countries accounting for more than four-fifths of global greenhouse gas emissions got low marks for their net zero plans in a peer-reviewed assessment published Thursday.

Text size:

Of the four biggest carbon polluters, only the European Union's plan was deemed credible, while those of China, the United States and India were found lacking.

Most nations have set targets to eliminate their carbon footprint around mid-century, with commitments from China and India for 2060 and 2070, respectively.

The extent to which Earth remains hospitable in a warming world depends in large measure on whether these pledges are kept, but assessing their credibility has proven difficult.

Many net-zero goals lack details, and some do not even specify if they cover just CO2 or other important planet-warming gases as well, such as methane and nitrous oxide.

These uncertainties, in turn, have confounded attempts to project global temperature increases, and whether the Paris climate treaty goals of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius, and at 1.5C if possible, remains within reach.

If both short-term and long-term plans from all countries are accepted at face value, global warming could stabilise in that critical range between 1.5C and 2C.

But if only policies already in place are taken into account and more-or-less vague promises are set aside, temperatures are more likely to settle between 2.5C and 3C.

"The two outcomes could not contrast more," Joeri Rogelj, director of research at Imperial College's Grantham Institute, and a team of international scientists wrote in the journal Science.

- 'A high-risk track' -

One scenario sees climate damages capped a "potentially manageable levels," and the other "a world where climate change continues toward levels that undermine sustainable development."

Every country in the world whose greenhouse gas emissions comprise at least 0.1 percent of the global total was then given a "credibility rating" of higher, lower or much lower.

A handful of countries besides the European Union got top marks, including Britain and New Zealand.

But around 90 percent inspired lower or much lower confidence, including the US and China, which together account for more than a third of global emissions.

Most of the worlds major emerging economies -- Brazil, India, South Africa and Indonesia, for example -- got the lowest ratings, as did Gulf states Egypt and the United Arab Emirates, hosts respectively of last year's COP27 climate summit and COP28 in Dubai in December.

Among wealthy nations, only Australia was in the least credible tier.

Today, a third of the 35 nations have net zero policies enshrined in law.

"Making targets legally binding is crucial to ensure long-term plans are adopted," said co-author Robin Lamboll, from Imperial College's Centre for Environmental Policy.

"We need to see concrete legislation in order to trust that action will follow promises."

Detailed, step-by-step plans showing how emissions cuts will be distributed over time across all economic and social sectors is key, the authors said.

The researchers applied the new credibility ratings to model different scenarios for future emissions and the temperatures they will yield.

When only net-zero plans that inspired high confidence were added to policies already under way, global warming was projected to top out at 2.4C by 2100 -- still far above the Paris targets.

"The world is still on a high-risk climate track, and we are far from delivering a safe climate future," Rogelj said in a statement.

mh/cw

M.Sugiyama--JT