The Japan Times - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

EUR -
AED 4.236702
AFN 76.139772
ALL 93.404971
AMD 420.508216
AOA 1059.0311
ARS 1713.661212
AUD 1.63963
AWG 2.076532
AZN 1.962383
BAM 1.954883
BBD 2.315524
BDT 141.963408
BHD 0.4335
BIF 3411.614467
BMD 1.153629
BND 1.475533
BOB 13.651774
BRL 5.854781
BSD 1.149646
BTN 109.600014
BWP 15.675715
BYN 3.344346
BYR 22611.125577
BZD 2.312225
CAD 1.618391
CDF 2624.505383
CHF 0.932219
CLF 0.02698
CLP 1065.31818
CNY 7.788498
CNH 7.787895
COP 3616.94948
CRC 522.159592
CUC 1.153629
CUP 30.571165
CVE 110.214734
CZK 24.214094
DJF 204.724855
DKK 7.474886
DOP 66.699291
DZD 153.293567
EGP 58.192036
ERN 17.304433
ETB 183.716918
FJD 2.552346
FKP 0.855699
GBP 0.856068
GEL 3.016724
GGP 0.855699
GHS 13.43987
GIP 0.855699
GMD 84.786541
GNF 10092.309643
GTQ 8.771999
GYD 240.490318
HKD 9.047098
HNL 30.804684
HRK 7.534469
HTG 150.326652
HUF 363.349217
IDR 20756.090376
ILS 3.51227
IMP 0.855699
INR 109.803029
IQD 1506.086997
IRR 1586383.88046
ISK 142.000089
JEP 0.855699
JMD 182.003837
JOD 0.817881
JPY 180.461587
KES 149.281774
KGS 100.885006
KHR 4652.039611
KMF 492.599566
KRW 1645.294067
KWD 0.35714
KYD 0.958055
KZT 544.766822
LAK 26036.125512
LBP 102955.451897
LKR 385.94398
LRD 207.511761
LSL 19.016027
LTL 3.406366
LVL 0.697819
LYD 7.355582
MAD 10.739802
MDL 20.090837
MGA 4916.714978
MKD 61.544411
MMK 2422.255061
MNT 4145.598238
MOP 9.287503
MRU 46.204727
MUR 54.151159
MVR 17.835214
MWK 1993.473542
MXN 19.964874
MYR 4.725243
MZN 73.728591
NAD 19.015862
NGN 1569.177788
NIO 42.310336
NOK 10.953826
NPR 175.358503
NZD 1.960171
OMR 0.443565
PAB 1.149636
PEN 3.896172
PGK 5.147608
PHP 70.29042
PKR 319.287413
PLN 4.304212
PYG 6854.814255
QAR 4.202683
RON 5.245898
RSD 117.399053
RUB 91.49872
RWF 1687.715641
SAR 4.317605
SBD 9.322596
SCR 16.983364
SDG 692.177424
SEK 10.961147
SGD 1.478047
SLE 28.492096
SOS 656.988972
SRD 43.585831
STD 23877.788151
STN 24.488619
SVC 10.059325
SZL 19.013164
THB 38.436617
TJS 10.611177
TMT 4.049237
TND 3.379759
TRY 54.839941
TTD 7.806372
TWD 37.25057
TZS 3051.585927
UAH 51.312553
UGX 4317.0311
USD 1.153629
UYU 46.258101
UZS 13761.604354
VES 860.256886
VND 30326.018551
VUV 137.339694
WST 3.154588
XAF 655.652288
XAG 0.019843
XAU 0.000284
XCD 3.11774
XCG 2.071937
XDR 0.815421
XOF 655.652288
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.905073
ZAR 18.977552
ZMK 10384.038595
ZMW 21.595963
ZWL 371.468021
  • RYCEF

    -0.3100

    19.55

    -1.59%

  • VOD

    -0.3600

    15.78

    -2.28%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.21

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    21.68

    -0.09%

  • RIO

    -0.3300

    96.85

    -0.34%

  • BCC

    1.0000

    76.38

    +1.31%

  • RELX

    -1.1900

    35.42

    -3.36%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    22.11

    +0.41%

  • NGG

    -0.4200

    79.97

    -0.53%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    21.84

    +0.14%

  • GSK

    -0.3800

    51.69

    -0.74%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.96

    +0.69%

  • BTI

    -1.0400

    60.65

    -1.71%

  • BP

    1.0000

    45.22

    +2.21%

  • AZN

    -1.7000

    169.64

    -1%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: Joseph Prezioso - AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

M.Matsumoto--JT