The Japan Times - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.277424
AFN 76.282379
ALL 96.389901
AMD 444.278751
ANG 2.0846
AOA 1067.888653
ARS 1666.882107
AUD 1.752778
AWG 2.096182
AZN 1.984351
BAM 1.954928
BBD 2.344654
BDT 142.403852
BGN 1.956425
BHD 0.438198
BIF 3455.206503
BMD 1.164546
BND 1.508021
BOB 8.044377
BRL 6.334667
BSD 1.164081
BTN 104.66486
BWP 15.466034
BYN 3.346807
BYR 22825.091832
BZD 2.341246
CAD 1.610276
CDF 2599.265981
CHF 0.936525
CLF 0.027366
CLP 1073.571668
CNY 8.233458
CNH 8.232219
COP 4463.819362
CRC 568.64633
CUC 1.164546
CUP 30.860456
CVE 110.752812
CZK 24.203336
DJF 206.963485
DKK 7.470448
DOP 74.822506
DZD 151.068444
EGP 55.295038
ERN 17.468183
ETB 180.679691
FJD 2.632397
FKP 0.872083
GBP 0.872973
GEL 3.138497
GGP 0.872083
GHS 13.3345
GIP 0.872083
GMD 85.012236
GNF 10116.993527
GTQ 8.917022
GYD 243.550308
HKD 9.065929
HNL 30.604708
HRK 7.535429
HTG 152.392019
HUF 381.994667
IDR 19435.740377
ILS 3.768132
IMP 0.872083
INR 104.760771
IQD 1525.554607
IRR 49041.926882
ISK 149.038983
JEP 0.872083
JMD 186.32688
JOD 0.825709
JPY 180.935883
KES 150.58016
KGS 101.839952
KHR 4664.005142
KMF 491.43861
KPW 1048.083022
KRW 1716.311573
KWD 0.357481
KYD 0.970163
KZT 588.714849
LAK 25258.992337
LBP 104285.050079
LKR 359.069821
LRD 206.012492
LSL 19.73949
LTL 3.438601
LVL 0.704422
LYD 6.347216
MAD 10.756329
MDL 19.807079
MGA 5225.31607
MKD 61.612515
MMK 2445.475195
MNT 4130.063083
MOP 9.335036
MRU 46.419225
MUR 53.689904
MVR 17.938355
MWK 2022.815938
MXN 21.164687
MYR 4.787492
MZN 74.426542
NAD 19.739485
NGN 1688.68458
NIO 42.826206
NOK 11.767853
NPR 167.464295
NZD 2.015483
OMR 0.446978
PAB 1.164176
PEN 4.096293
PGK 4.876539
PHP 68.66747
PKR 326.50949
PLN 4.229804
PYG 8006.428369
QAR 4.240169
RON 5.092096
RSD 117.610988
RUB 88.93302
RWF 1689.755523
SAR 4.37074
SBD 9.584899
SCR 15.748939
SDG 700.4784
SEK 10.946786
SGD 1.508557
SHP 0.873711
SLE 27.603998
SLL 24419.93473
SOS 665.542019
SRD 44.985272
STD 24103.740676
STN 24.921274
SVC 10.184839
SYP 12877.828498
SZL 19.739476
THB 37.119932
TJS 10.680789
TMT 4.087555
TND 3.436865
TOP 2.803946
TRY 49.523506
TTD 7.89148
TWD 36.437508
TZS 2835.668687
UAH 48.86364
UGX 4118.162907
USD 1.164546
UYU 45.529689
UZS 13980.369136
VES 296.437311
VND 30697.419423
VUV 142.156196
WST 3.249257
XAF 655.661697
XAG 0.019993
XAU 0.000278
XCD 3.147243
XCG 2.098055
XDR 0.815205
XOF 655.061029
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.802752
ZAR 19.711451
ZMK 10482.311144
ZMW 26.913878
ZWL 374.983176
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • AZN

    0.1500

    90.18

    +0.17%

  • NGG

    -0.5000

    75.41

    -0.66%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    23.25

    -0.3%

  • SCS

    -0.0900

    16.14

    -0.56%

  • GSK

    -0.1600

    48.41

    -0.33%

  • BTI

    -1.0300

    57.01

    -1.81%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    23.43

    -0.21%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    14.62

    -0.34%

  • RELX

    -0.2200

    40.32

    -0.55%

  • RIO

    -0.6700

    73.06

    -0.92%

  • BCC

    -1.2100

    73.05

    -1.66%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    13.79

    +0.29%

  • VOD

    -0.1630

    12.47

    -1.31%

  • BCE

    0.3300

    23.55

    +1.4%

  • BP

    -1.4000

    35.83

    -3.91%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

S.Yamamoto--JT