The Japan Times - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.120835
AFN 72.376646
ALL 91.446363
AMD 404.430758
ANG 2.00828
AOA 1030.068071
ARS 1734.359288
AUD 1.62136
AWG 2.022547
AZN 1.912974
BAM 1.961233
BBD 2.259861
BDT 139.356061
BGN 1.961204
BHD 0.423252
BIF 3378.578422
BMD 1.122079
BND 1.436078
BOB 13.334763
BRL 6.181191
BSD 1.122008
BTN 105.309742
BWP 15.416709
BYN 3.359607
BYR 21992.738982
BZD 2.256652
CAD 1.584964
CDF 2570.681235
CHF 0.920132
CLF 0.027649
CLP 1088.168925
CNY 7.487409
CNH 7.483652
COP 3676.0751
CRC 508.2079
CUC 1.122079
CUP 26.928601
CVE 110.665006
CZK 24.345714
DJF 199.415625
DKK 7.476381
DOP 68.053886
DZD 152.620074
EGP 60.46562
ERN 16.831178
ETB 180.876813
FJD 2.526699
FKP 0.840202
GBP 0.834944
GEL 2.911781
GGP 0.840202
GHS 13.111489
GIP 0.840202
GMD 83.033728
GNF 9944.378364
GTQ 8.573714
GYD 235.220589
HKD 8.799957
HNL 30.380262
HRK 7.595361
HTG 147.067424
HUF 362.431919
IDR 20293.912103
ILS 3.54441
IMP 0.840202
INR 105.415967
IQD 1698.826878
IRR 2134513.700104
ISK 137.228052
JEP 0.840202
JMD 178.243793
JOD 0.795585
JPY 177.315894
KES 145.756644
KGS 98.126077
KHR 4583.690588
KMF 495.958991
KPW 1009.870624
KRW 1509.96422
KWD 0.348775
KYD 0.935082
KZT 503.404593
LAK 25252.377599
LBP 100482.130971
LKR 373.071867
LRD 191.090351
LSL 18.581951
LTL 3.313206
LVL 0.678734
LYD 7.214799
MAD 10.948678
MDL 20.224849
MGA 5155.950214
MKD 61.536967
MMK 2355.754922
MNT 4040.791023
MOP 9.062205
MRU 45.163564
MUR 52.858792
MVR 17.275707
MWK 1949.05068
MXN 20.803113
MYR 4.553845
MZN 71.696486
NAD 18.581481
NGN 1511.450807
NIO 41.079237
NOK 10.551522
NPR 168.495788
NZD 1.991925
OMR 0.431396
PAB 1.122109
PEN 3.862754
PGK 5.040344
PHP 70.762196
PKR 310.423176
PLN 4.386822
PYG 7013.429462
QAR 4.087729
RON 5.343004
RSD 117.67346
RUB 92.574778
RWF 1655.065816
SAR 4.219482
SBD 9.031142
SCR 15.780944
SDG 674.960217
SEK 11.000016
SGD 1.435267
SHP 0.840351
SLE 25.751724
SLL 23529.430449
SOS 641.25269
SRD 42.136277
STD 23224.759885
STN 24.994299
SVC 9.8182
SYP 14589.264556
SZL 18.581752
THB 37.488452
TJS 10.300189
TMT 3.927275
TND 3.349961
TOP 2.701695
TRY 56.354259
TTD 7.610082
TWD 36.808219
TZS 2967.895463
UAH 51.116008
UGX 4594.728881
USD 1.122079
UYU 45.245142
UZS 13464.942184
VES 1005.737375
VND 28630.394464
VUV 133.821406
WST 3.128157
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021033
XAU 0.000271308372
XCD 3.032473
XCG 2.022202
XDR 0.793368
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 265.51185
ZAR 18.382448
ZMK 10100.052768
ZMW 22.805178
ZWL 361.308825
SSP 6446.60178
MXV 2.338638
  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    19.81

    +0.5%

  • VOD

    -0.2500

    16.33

    -1.53%

  • CMSC

    -0.2800

    20.12

    -1.39%

  • RBGPF

    -2.0000

    65

    -3.08%

  • RIO

    -0.2500

    94.16

    -0.27%

  • BTI

    -1.2000

    54.85

    -2.19%

  • NGG

    -0.3000

    74.94

    -0.4%

  • GSK

    -0.3500

    49.35

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    -0.4200

    20.14

    -2.09%

  • CMSD

    -0.3400

    19.93

    -1.71%

  • BP

    -0.9100

    43.52

    -2.09%

  • RELX

    0.1700

    33.24

    +0.51%

  • BCC

    -0.6200

    75.97

    -0.82%

  • AZN

    -1.9400

    164.21

    -1.18%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

S.Yamamoto--JT