The Japan Times - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.257664
AFN 73.026624
ALL 96.238144
AMD 437.582231
ANG 2.074968
AOA 1062.937298
ARS 1598.08421
AUD 1.645579
AWG 2.089361
AZN 1.97515
BAM 1.95864
BBD 2.333975
BDT 142.192527
BGN 1.981339
BHD 0.43431
BIF 3442.663586
BMD 1.159146
BND 1.482068
BOB 8.007716
BRL 6.159011
BSD 1.158876
BTN 108.338579
BWP 15.802121
BYN 3.515914
BYR 22719.261378
BZD 2.33067
CAD 1.591566
CDF 2637.057544
CHF 0.913917
CLF 0.027244
CLP 1075.745893
CNY 7.982348
CNH 8.005172
COP 4303.433806
CRC 541.282631
CUC 1.159146
CUP 30.717369
CVE 111.1046
CZK 24.515015
DJF 206.003881
DKK 7.48519
DOP 68.390029
DZD 152.108556
EGP 59.995792
ERN 17.38719
ETB 182.160246
FJD 2.566871
FKP 0.868268
GBP 0.86899
GEL 3.147128
GGP 0.868268
GHS 12.640533
GIP 0.868268
GMD 85.201694
GNF 10174.408376
GTQ 8.876835
GYD 242.454744
HKD 9.082315
HNL 30.787368
HRK 7.547552
HTG 152.028504
HUF 393.739159
IDR 19654.711213
ILS 3.60393
IMP 0.868268
INR 109.016
IQD 1518.481245
IRR 1525001.44174
ISK 144.047519
JEP 0.868268
JMD 182.063242
JOD 0.82188
JPY 184.581294
KES 150.229726
KGS 101.364887
KHR 4648.175821
KMF 494.955743
KPW 1043.174412
KRW 1744.874492
KWD 0.35536
KYD 0.965713
KZT 557.135552
LAK 24904.251971
LBP 103801.523689
LKR 361.50269
LRD 212.558441
LSL 19.717515
LTL 3.422657
LVL 0.701156
LYD 7.395793
MAD 10.850191
MDL 20.181528
MGA 4833.639175
MKD 61.634787
MMK 2433.943509
MNT 4137.774242
MOP 9.354025
MRU 46.516967
MUR 53.904625
MVR 17.920835
MWK 2013.436982
MXN 20.747095
MYR 4.565921
MZN 74.073751
NAD 19.508864
NGN 1572.092184
NIO 42.564277
NOK 11.093021
NPR 173.341379
NZD 1.985179
OMR 0.442313
PAB 1.158896
PEN 4.032714
PGK 4.997948
PHP 69.723065
PKR 323.63785
PLN 4.282755
PYG 7568.943802
QAR 4.224512
RON 5.101986
RSD 117.884032
RUB 96.003268
RWF 1691.193997
SAR 4.352659
SBD 9.33305
SCR 16.654324
SDG 696.647132
SEK 10.831104
SGD 1.486377
SHP 0.86966
SLE 28.486057
SLL 24306.724357
SOS 662.456177
SRD 43.45349
STD 23991.981659
STN 24.939026
SVC 10.139705
SYP 128.393177
SZL 19.508855
THB 38.008825
TJS 11.130786
TMT 4.068602
TND 3.372
TOP 2.790945
TRY 51.328032
TTD 7.862368
TWD 37.135217
TZS 2998.321243
UAH 50.766603
UGX 4380.333447
USD 1.159146
UYU 46.697721
UZS 14135.785719
VES 527.05282
VND 30499.449254
VUV 137.980492
WST 3.180888
XAF 656.918161
XAG 0.017031
XAU 0.000257
XCD 3.13265
XCG 2.08852
XDR 0.81819
XOF 661.296951
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.576393
ZAR 19.853279
ZMK 10433.709028
ZMW 22.627107
ZWL 373.244535
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • NGG

    -3.5400

    81.99

    -4.32%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    68.3

    -2.28%

  • CMSD

    -0.2420

    22.658

    -1.07%

  • BTI

    -1.3500

    57.37

    -2.35%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.79

    +0.23%

  • CMSC

    -0.2000

    22.65

    -0.88%

  • GSK

    -0.5300

    51.84

    -1.02%

  • RELX

    -0.4600

    33.36

    -1.38%

  • RIO

    -2.5000

    83.15

    -3.01%

  • AZN

    -5.3300

    183.6

    -2.9%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.33

    -0.63%

  • RYCEF

    -0.6100

    15.99

    -3.81%

  • JRI

    -0.3900

    11.77

    -3.31%

  • BP

    -1.0800

    44.78

    -2.41%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

S.Yamamoto--JT