The Japan Times - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.302647
AFN 72.638638
ALL 95.608183
AMD 431.881383
ANG 2.097675
AOA 1075.514006
ARS 1630.845589
AUD 1.613503
AWG 2.110316
AZN 1.989448
BAM 1.95625
BBD 2.359683
BDT 143.813068
BGN 1.956452
BHD 0.441981
BIF 3486.049359
BMD 1.171584
BND 1.49093
BOB 8.096103
BRL 5.889319
BSD 1.171589
BTN 112.066812
BWP 15.783101
BYN 3.264623
BYR 22963.054086
BZD 2.356322
CAD 1.605832
CDF 2625.52082
CHF 0.915892
CLF 0.026416
CLP 1039.652225
CNY 7.956171
CNH 7.951883
COP 4443.409545
CRC 533.331738
CUC 1.171584
CUP 31.046986
CVE 110.656382
CZK 24.338137
DJF 208.213644
DKK 7.472833
DOP 69.41625
DZD 155.213843
EGP 62.000466
ERN 17.573766
ETB 184.37803
FJD 2.583519
FKP 0.866046
GBP 0.866328
GEL 3.139832
GGP 0.866046
GHS 13.230052
GIP 0.866046
GMD 85.525327
GNF 10283.581368
GTQ 8.938055
GYD 245.112637
HKD 9.173915
HNL 31.175614
HRK 7.535401
HTG 153.010407
HUF 358.199779
IDR 20506.534512
ILS 3.410125
IMP 0.866046
INR 112.090223
IQD 1534.775554
IRR 1538290.307204
ISK 143.612919
JEP 0.866046
JMD 185.287069
JOD 0.830693
JPY 184.926419
KES 151.345235
KGS 102.45502
KHR 4699.225459
KMF 493.237542
KPW 1054.445637
KRW 1745.133131
KWD 0.361129
KYD 0.976354
KZT 549.881745
LAK 25716.277199
LBP 105150.654656
LKR 380.233921
LRD 214.57545
LSL 19.225625
LTL 3.459384
LVL 0.70868
LYD 7.410236
MAD 10.747822
MDL 20.09322
MGA 4891.365002
MKD 61.668128
MMK 2459.488263
MNT 4193.890538
MOP 9.450755
MRU 46.863029
MUR 54.841737
MVR 18.053658
MWK 2040.317469
MXN 20.125359
MYR 4.604916
MZN 74.879938
NAD 19.225731
NGN 1605.855166
NIO 43.002986
NOK 10.743192
NPR 179.313588
NZD 1.973194
OMR 0.450471
PAB 1.171609
PEN 4.01678
PGK 5.108049
PHP 71.437396
PKR 326.404046
PLN 4.248575
PYG 7164.647427
QAR 4.268669
RON 5.209682
RSD 117.42909
RUB 86.90246
RWF 1710.513213
SAR 4.402898
SBD 9.410468
SCR 16.259612
SDG 703.535975
SEK 10.923262
SGD 1.490179
SHP 0.874706
SLE 28.824564
SLL 24567.541377
SOS 669.56084
SRD 43.575928
STD 24249.431498
STN 24.896168
SVC 10.251357
SYP 129.552586
SZL 19.313562
THB 37.877654
TJS 10.971904
TMT 4.112261
TND 3.374746
TOP 2.820894
TRY 53.219686
TTD 7.948963
TWD 36.947672
TZS 3043.366066
UAH 51.519507
UGX 4393.085133
USD 1.171584
UYU 46.541496
UZS 14150.396048
VES 595.240638
VND 30868.905564
VUV 138.222207
WST 3.166486
XAF 656.124669
XAG 0.013388
XAU 0.00025
XCD 3.166265
XCG 2.111467
XDR 0.814215
XOF 654.328298
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.56933
ZAR 19.250415
ZMK 10545.665034
ZMW 22.113745
ZWL 377.249696
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    61

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    23.05

    -0.26%

  • BCC

    -0.9500

    66.98

    -1.42%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    23.56

    -0.17%

  • NGG

    -0.2600

    86.98

    -0.3%

  • RIO

    2.5400

    112.04

    +2.27%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0800

    16

    -0.5%

  • BCE

    -0.0800

    24.39

    -0.33%

  • GSK

    0.0900

    50.99

    +0.18%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.13

    -0.08%

  • RELX

    -1.1500

    31.62

    -3.64%

  • VOD

    0.4150

    15.51

    +2.68%

  • AZN

    3.1800

    187.72

    +1.69%

  • BTI

    1.7100

    65.35

    +2.62%

  • BP

    -0.2600

    44.14

    -0.59%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

S.Yamamoto--JT