The Japan Times - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.288202
AFN 72.394561
ALL 95.253302
AMD 430.605975
ANG 2.090632
AOA 1071.903393
ARS 1628.859035
AUD 1.616282
AWG 2.103231
AZN 1.987433
BAM 1.950773
BBD 2.352228
BDT 143.359938
BGN 1.949883
BHD 0.440455
BIF 3477.024586
BMD 1.167651
BND 1.487036
BOB 8.070099
BRL 5.847945
BSD 1.167885
BTN 111.902225
BWP 16.449397
BYN 3.262808
BYR 22885.957359
BZD 2.348787
CAD 1.603751
CDF 2616.705908
CHF 0.914609
CLF 0.026418
CLP 1039.73484
CNY 7.929459
CNH 7.92292
COP 4434.691358
CRC 530.711867
CUC 1.167651
CUP 30.942748
CVE 109.975464
CZK 24.310604
DJF 207.963174
DKK 7.472861
DOP 69.221611
DZD 154.771984
EGP 61.744563
ERN 17.514763
ETB 182.344098
FJD 2.556219
FKP 0.863701
GBP 0.866134
GEL 3.128944
GGP 0.863701
GHS 13.260656
GIP 0.863701
GMD 85.2381
GNF 10240.346841
GTQ 8.910038
GYD 244.327214
HKD 9.145585
HNL 31.058959
HRK 7.527616
HTG 152.929995
HUF 357.243954
IDR 20470.262824
ILS 3.389226
IMP 0.863701
INR 111.621618
IQD 1529.857455
IRR 1533125.612722
ISK 143.609314
JEP 0.863701
JMD 184.654134
JOD 0.82792
JPY 184.682089
KES 150.802256
KGS 102.110928
KHR 4685.964089
KMF 491.581018
KPW 1050.851539
KRW 1742.263837
KWD 0.359952
KYD 0.973288
KZT 552.822971
LAK 25599.480331
LBP 104581.044182
LKR 379.861073
LRD 213.718318
LSL 19.170895
LTL 3.44777
LVL 0.7063
LYD 7.412896
MAD 10.714612
MDL 20.075007
MGA 4891.290094
MKD 61.542796
MMK 2451.909298
MNT 4180.34222
MOP 9.422197
MRU 46.668732
MUR 54.755716
MVR 17.993465
MWK 2024.673611
MXN 20.110872
MYR 4.590616
MZN 74.615687
NAD 19.170895
NGN 1600.545488
NIO 42.979056
NOK 10.786523
NPR 179.039171
NZD 1.972092
OMR 0.448961
PAB 1.167865
PEN 3.991796
PGK 5.087758
PHP 71.877129
PKR 325.279732
PLN 4.23986
PYG 7116.659892
QAR 4.25712
RON 5.203982
RSD 117.381089
RUB 85.534778
RWF 1708.175973
SAR 4.389286
SBD 9.378873
SCR 15.920493
SDG 701.171987
SEK 10.914442
SGD 1.488539
SHP 0.871769
SLE 28.721139
SLL 24485.057705
SOS 667.448502
SRD 43.429655
STD 24168.015855
STN 24.43692
SVC 10.218404
SYP 129.058973
SZL 19.15655
THB 37.808599
TJS 10.913535
TMT 4.098455
TND 3.402731
TOP 2.811423
TRY 53.052533
TTD 7.929362
TWD 36.807928
TZS 3037.52743
UAH 51.339537
UGX 4367.632104
USD 1.167651
UYU 46.508948
UZS 14002.554719
VES 593.242161
VND 30761.762583
VUV 137.873483
WST 3.162607
XAF 654.256928
XAG 0.013797
XAU 0.000249
XCD 3.155634
XCG 2.104767
XDR 0.811481
XOF 654.254134
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.630658
ZAR 19.235416
ZMK 10510.256279
ZMW 21.984309
ZWL 375.983109
  • RIO

    -1.9700

    110.07

    -1.79%

  • RELX

    0.0800

    31.7

    +0.25%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    23.6

    +0.17%

  • BCE

    0.0350

    24.425

    +0.14%

  • NGG

    0.4900

    87.47

    +0.56%

  • GSK

    -0.0600

    50.93

    -0.12%

  • AZN

    -2.1500

    185.57

    -1.16%

  • CMSC

    0.0515

    23.1017

    +0.22%

  • RBGPF

    -0.2100

    60.79

    -0.35%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    16.1

    +0.62%

  • BCC

    2.6230

    69.603

    +3.77%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.1

    -0.23%

  • BTI

    1.9100

    67.26

    +2.84%

  • BP

    0.1550

    44.295

    +0.35%

  • VOD

    0.0730

    15.583

    +0.47%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

H.Hayashi--JT