The Japan Times - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.048988
AFN 71.653352
ALL 90.233152
AMD 397.442801
ANG 1.973656
AOA 1011.960474
ARS 1704.382464
AUD 1.628051
AWG 1.984235
AZN 1.878376
BAM 1.951036
BBD 2.220877
BDT 137.145087
BGN 1.95499
BHD 0.415753
BIF 3312.570815
BMD 1.102353
BND 1.419813
BOB 12.873388
BRL 6.246268
BSD 1.102607
BTN 103.857962
BWP 15.412153
BYN 3.303388
BYR 21606.119128
BZD 2.217684
CAD 1.573224
CDF 2551.947633
CHF 0.924565
CLF 0.027875
CLP 1097.084206
CNY 7.354624
CNH 7.358449
COP 3659.778945
CRC 494.093407
CUC 1.102353
CUP 26.463016
CVE 110.401089
CZK 24.405329
DJF 195.910612
DKK 7.476493
DOP 66.917109
DZD 151.273137
EGP 58.978161
ERN 16.535295
ETB 177.534385
FJD 2.483877
FKP 0.834353
GBP 0.834294
GEL 2.855525
GGP 0.834353
GHS 12.925133
GIP 0.834353
GMD 81.574515
GNF 9764.096088
GTQ 8.429301
GYD 230.683524
HKD 8.648676
HNL 29.708842
HRK 7.531237
HTG 144.594927
HUF 364.882711
IDR 20101.848202
ILS 3.545943
IMP 0.834353
INR 103.905536
IQD 1668.962467
IRR 2109614.310597
ISK 136.615035
JEP 0.834353
JMD 174.224538
JOD 0.781612
JPY 176.073379
KES 143.361434
KGS 96.384792
KHR 4497.600695
KMF 492.752185
KPW 992.118101
KRW 1473.366503
KWD 0.34335
KYD 0.918844
KZT 491.483094
LAK 24836.013852
LBP 98715.713034
LKR 366.73942
LRD 187.400397
LSL 18.663257
LTL 3.254962
LVL 0.666803
LYD 7.104708
MAD 10.981314
MDL 20.028816
MGA 5059.800729
MKD 61.545168
MMK 2314.774623
MNT 3973.283421
MOP 8.911016
MRU 44.759659
MUR 52.494468
MVR 16.980358
MWK 1913.685217
MXN 20.433771
MYR 4.504329
MZN 70.444469
NAD 18.663252
NGN 1481.088858
NIO 40.570694
NOK 10.552253
NPR 166.167676
NZD 1.994849
OMR 0.424561
PAB 1.102607
PEN 3.75135
PGK 4.97327
PHP 70.506912
PKR 304.914924
PLN 4.405592
PYG 6843.288459
QAR 4.01725
RON 5.348511
RSD 117.465677
RUB 91.30685
RWF 1627.073053
SAR 4.160787
SBD 8.926521
SCR 15.372648
SDG 663.069392
SEK 11.106249
SGD 1.418953
SHP 0.830054
SLE 25.409646
SLL 23115.795624
SOS 631.101139
SRD 41.327623
STD 22816.481805
STN 24.472237
SVC 9.648438
SYP 14332.794295
SZL 18.663243
THB 37.34225
TJS 10.171722
TMT 3.858236
TND 3.316433
TOP 2.654202
TRY 55.49477
TTD 7.484722
TWD 36.257938
TZS 2920.045358
UAH 50.132575
UGX 4553.879273
USD 1.102353
UYU 44.690863
UZS 13271.228337
VES 1006.315196
VND 28358.582532
VUV 132.985681
WST 3.098252
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.022553
XAU 0.000284217451
XCD 2.979165
XCG 1.987211
XDR 0.779421
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 260.762006
ZAR 18.713826
ZMK 9922.503926
ZMW 22.543641
ZWL 354.957222
SSP 6555.09164
MXV 2.294737
  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    19.81

    +0.5%

  • VOD

    -0.2500

    16.33

    -1.53%

  • CMSC

    -0.2800

    20.12

    -1.39%

  • RBGPF

    -2.0000

    65

    -3.08%

  • RIO

    -0.2500

    94.16

    -0.27%

  • BTI

    -1.2000

    54.85

    -2.19%

  • NGG

    -0.3000

    74.94

    -0.4%

  • GSK

    -0.3500

    49.35

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    -0.4200

    20.14

    -2.09%

  • CMSD

    -0.3400

    19.93

    -1.71%

  • BP

    -0.9100

    43.52

    -2.09%

  • RELX

    0.1700

    33.24

    +0.51%

  • BCC

    -0.6200

    75.97

    -0.82%

  • AZN

    -1.9400

    164.21

    -1.18%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

T.Ueda--JT