The Japan Times - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.34565
AFN 76.914273
ALL 96.607572
AMD 446.36223
ANG 2.118193
AOA 1085.081707
ARS 1709.824236
AUD 1.683447
AWG 2.13289
AZN 2.021476
BAM 1.956958
BBD 2.375416
BDT 144.135286
BGN 1.987191
BHD 0.446102
BIF 3494.697374
BMD 1.183295
BND 1.499187
BOB 8.149822
BRL 6.199519
BSD 1.179403
BTN 106.558601
BWP 16.290708
BYN 3.379214
BYR 23192.585239
BZD 2.372014
CAD 1.6135
CDF 2603.249667
CHF 0.917087
CLF 0.025772
CLP 1017.634253
CNY 8.209944
CNH 8.203661
COP 4321.393943
CRC 585.768881
CUC 1.183295
CUP 31.357322
CVE 110.329817
CZK 24.339203
DJF 210.025161
DKK 7.468545
DOP 74.266769
DZD 153.602363
EGP 55.650127
ERN 17.749427
ETB 182.951611
FJD 2.600706
FKP 0.866753
GBP 0.862563
GEL 3.189017
GGP 0.866753
GHS 12.920645
GIP 0.866753
GMD 86.380406
GNF 10347.516218
GTQ 9.046315
GYD 246.746002
HKD 9.247682
HNL 31.161624
HRK 7.533807
HTG 154.701538
HUF 380.912173
IDR 19848.593102
ILS 3.656778
IMP 0.866753
INR 107.051295
IQD 1545.02073
IRR 49846.309022
ISK 144.988891
JEP 0.866753
JMD 184.836398
JOD 0.838943
JPY 184.975657
KES 152.088635
KGS 103.479199
KHR 4758.75547
KMF 494.617247
KPW 1064.950559
KRW 1716.717192
KWD 0.36371
KYD 0.982882
KZT 591.302377
LAK 25369.011047
LBP 105616.640496
LKR 365.056007
LRD 219.367948
LSL 18.890578
LTL 3.493963
LVL 0.715764
LYD 7.456444
MAD 10.818702
MDL 19.972818
MGA 5227.115013
MKD 61.634227
MMK 2485.061759
MNT 4222.50488
MOP 9.491156
MRU 47.08365
MUR 54.289889
MVR 18.282221
MWK 2045.118755
MXN 20.373735
MYR 4.646762
MZN 75.435099
NAD 18.890658
NGN 1642.59147
NIO 43.406051
NOK 11.390362
NPR 170.501371
NZD 1.958797
OMR 0.454974
PAB 1.179398
PEN 3.970449
PGK 5.053182
PHP 69.762331
PKR 329.85297
PLN 4.224598
PYG 7824.662979
QAR 4.288619
RON 5.095033
RSD 117.375808
RUB 91.110678
RWF 1721.38402
SAR 4.437519
SBD 9.535112
SCR 16.849789
SDG 711.752142
SEK 10.5164
SGD 1.503181
SHP 0.887778
SLE 28.961135
SLL 24813.1071
SOS 672.923765
SRD 45.100704
STD 24491.820857
STN 24.515438
SVC 10.320106
SYP 13086.741503
SZL 18.897262
THB 37.358404
TJS 11.021528
TMT 4.153366
TND 3.410504
TOP 2.849091
TRY 51.487184
TTD 7.988761
TWD 37.331541
TZS 3054.72387
UAH 51.040817
UGX 4204.487829
USD 1.183295
UYU 45.426495
UZS 14438.543402
VES 439.760484
VND 30762.716058
VUV 141.448244
WST 3.226037
XAF 656.370341
XAG 0.013535
XAU 0.000234
XCD 3.197915
XCG 2.125567
XDR 0.816286
XOF 656.34814
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.067981
ZAR 18.847602
ZMK 10651.062831
ZMW 23.145793
ZWL 381.02056
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    23.94

    -0.58%

  • CMSC

    -0.0900

    23.66

    -0.38%

  • BCC

    3.1800

    84.93

    +3.74%

  • BCE

    0.2700

    26.1

    +1.03%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.12

    -0.23%

  • RIO

    3.8500

    96.37

    +4%

  • GSK

    0.8700

    53.34

    +1.63%

  • NGG

    1.6200

    86.23

    +1.88%

  • BTI

    0.8800

    61.87

    +1.42%

  • RYCEF

    0.2600

    16.93

    +1.54%

  • AZN

    -4.0900

    184.32

    -2.22%

  • BP

    1.1200

    38.82

    +2.89%

  • VOD

    0.3400

    15.25

    +2.23%

  • RBGPF

    -2.1000

    82.1

    -2.56%

  • RELX

    -5.0200

    30.51

    -16.45%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

T.Ueda--JT