The Japan Times - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.268315
AFN 74.383357
ALL 96.069565
AMD 438.430669
ANG 2.0805
AOA 1065.770893
ARS 1610.859736
AUD 1.673089
AWG 2.093478
AZN 1.935698
BAM 1.959148
BBD 2.34037
BDT 142.928584
BGN 1.986621
BHD 0.438831
BIF 3452.593924
BMD 1.162236
BND 1.490731
BOB 8.029137
BRL 5.986915
BSD 1.162021
BTN 107.846889
BWP 15.803894
BYN 3.455699
BYR 22779.833035
BZD 2.336995
CAD 1.614201
CDF 2655.709813
CHF 0.921212
CLF 0.027081
CLP 1069.176055
CNY 8.003798
CNH 7.989352
COP 4292.824668
CRC 540.253562
CUC 1.162236
CUP 30.799264
CVE 110.453301
CZK 24.521619
DJF 206.924337
DKK 7.471925
DOP 69.912194
DZD 154.160064
EGP 62.369209
ERN 17.433546
ETB 181.439465
FJD 2.623631
FKP 0.881558
GBP 0.871857
GEL 3.12639
GGP 0.881558
GHS 12.782506
GIP 0.881558
GMD 86.005571
GNF 10190.372536
GTQ 8.889154
GYD 243.198205
HKD 9.108923
HNL 30.867952
HRK 7.534319
HTG 152.529218
HUF 382.522792
IDR 19647.605993
ILS 3.645296
IMP 0.881558
INR 108.30288
IQD 1522.160462
IRR 1529357.795973
ISK 144.210321
JEP 0.881558
JMD 183.773297
JOD 0.823989
JPY 184.137177
KES 151.204654
KGS 101.637389
KHR 4649.205977
KMF 498.025366
KPW 1045.946896
KRW 1753.942231
KWD 0.359514
KYD 0.968409
KZT 552.401734
LAK 25609.090581
LBP 104057.817263
LKR 366.304475
LRD 213.22635
LSL 19.51547
LTL 3.431782
LVL 0.703025
LYD 7.411635
MAD 10.854405
MDL 20.469129
MGA 4916.656884
MKD 61.675934
MMK 2441.168262
MNT 4152.347734
MOP 9.382241
MRU 46.357029
MUR 54.381217
MVR 17.979526
MWK 2014.939086
MXN 20.706462
MYR 4.680306
MZN 74.32517
NAD 19.516311
NGN 1605.420575
NIO 42.764376
NOK 11.247845
NPR 172.555565
NZD 2.014254
OMR 0.446881
PAB 1.162046
PEN 4.043032
PGK 5.025481
PHP 69.946895
PKR 324.211215
PLN 4.280086
PYG 7546.800845
QAR 4.236686
RON 5.09652
RSD 117.423041
RUB 93.499543
RWF 1700.601609
SAR 4.36268
SBD 9.346748
SCR 16.101667
SDG 698.503739
SEK 10.890042
SGD 1.489417
SHP 0.871978
SLE 28.532786
SLL 24371.528338
SOS 664.072106
SRD 43.425788
STD 24055.946507
STN 24.54332
SVC 10.167333
SYP 128.714546
SZL 19.509435
THB 37.748856
TJS 11.111665
TMT 4.07945
TND 3.410986
TOP 2.798386
TRY 51.69999
TTD 7.886921
TWD 37.146187
TZS 3010.191905
UAH 50.847466
UGX 4328.528243
USD 1.162236
UYU 47.230519
UZS 14115.063345
VES 550.060735
VND 30607.49505
VUV 139.75194
WST 3.22836
XAF 657.116829
XAG 0.015374
XAU 0.000244
XCD 3.141002
XCG 2.09407
XDR 0.826295
XOF 657.071521
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.367942
ZAR 19.48344
ZMK 10461.519739
ZMW 22.397436
ZWL 374.23964
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • BCC

    0.0050

    75.855

    +0.01%

  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    15.45

    +2.59%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.3

    +0.24%

  • GSK

    1.1300

    56.32

    +2.01%

  • RIO

    1.8600

    95.15

    +1.95%

  • RELX

    0.1800

    33.33

    +0.54%

  • NGG

    2.2200

    86.82

    +2.56%

  • CMSC

    0.1550

    22.055

    +0.7%

  • JRI

    0.1800

    12.48

    +1.44%

  • CMSD

    0.1700

    22.27

    +0.76%

  • VOD

    0.1000

    15.12

    +0.66%

  • BTI

    -0.6500

    57.82

    -1.12%

  • AZN

    3.2500

    200.47

    +1.62%

  • BP

    -1.2400

    45.76

    -2.71%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

T.Ueda--JT